Source · Select Committees · Work and Pensions Committee
First Report - Cost of Living Support Payments
Work and Pensions Committee
HC 143
Published 14 November 2023
Recommendations
4
Rejected
Para 27
Change cost of living payment eligibility for UC claimants with nil awards in qualifying periods.
Recommendation
The Government should change the eligibility for the final cost of living payment in 2023/24 and for any possible future payments so that Universal Credit (UC) claimants who receive a nil UC award in the qualifying period, but received a …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects changing eligibility for nil-award Universal Credit claimants, citing that substantial changes would introduce complexity, risk delays, fraud, or error, and that DWP IT systems cannot distinguish reasons for nil awards.
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
5
Rejected
Para 31
Consider adding Housing Benefit as a qualifying benefit for future cost of living payments.
Recommendation
We are concerned that support payments do not reach all low-income households in receipt of benefits as some households only receive housing benefit. The Government should consider adding Housing Benefit as a qualifying benefit for future cost of living support …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects adding Housing Benefit as a qualifying benefit, explaining it is not an income-replacement benefit and administrative complexities would prevent quick, accurate payment delivery, instead pointing to the Household Support Fund.
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
6
Rejected
Clarify Household Support Fund guidance for local authorities assisting those with no recourse to public funds.
Recommendation
We are concerned that some people with no recourse to public funds could be denied Household Support Fund (HSF) support from local authorities, despite potentially being eligible for such support, due to a lack of clarity in the guidance. We …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects clarifying Household Support Fund guidance for those with No Recourse to Public Funds, stating that local authorities already have powers for care needs and the variety of factors involved means a definitive list or explicit guidance would not be appropriate.
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
9
Rejected
Para 61
Bring forward and publish evaluation of cost of living payments before financial year 2024/25.
Recommendation
The cost of living payments have had an important impact and boosted the finances of low-income households. However, one-off payments were not a sufficient response to the scale of the issue, and many people in receipt of the payments still …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects bringing forward the full evaluation of Cost of Living Payments, stating it would compromise robustness, but confirms an evaluation is underway with fieldwork in early 2024 and early findings feeding into policy decisions.
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
13
Rejected
Para 75
Increase future cost of living financial support for disabled people proportionate to additional costs.
Recommendation
Should there be future cost of living payments, or similar ad hoc support, the Government should increase the financial support for those with disabilities in proportion to the additional costs that they incur.
Government Response Summary
The government rejected the recommendation for future disability cost of living payments to be proportional to additional costs, explaining its current approach prioritizes higher payments for those on means-tested benefits due to their vulnerability.
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
14
Rejected
Para 83
Clarify legal position on uprating Universal Credit while maintaining one-off payments for legacy benefits.
Recommendation
It is clear that an uplift of regular working age benefits received would be more beneficial than ad-hoc cost of living support payments as it would better enable households to budget and reduce the chance of a recipient losing out …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejected the recommendation to uprate Universal Credit separately and maintain one-off payments only for legacy benefits, citing the statutory annual review duty and the breach of equal treatment requirements if differentiated.
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
Conclusions (1)
15
Conclusion
Rejected
We recognise that the Government is concerned that publishing exact payment windows could encourage fraud and disincentivise people from taking work opportunities. However, the irregular nature of these payments, along with the uncertainty of when they will be received, continues to make household budgeting a challenge. If the Government decides …
Government Response Summary
The government rejected the recommendation to announce future cost of living payment dates in advance, stating that doing so would implicitly reveal qualifying dates, which they aim to avoid to prevent fraud and maintain work incentives.