Source · Select Committees · Work and Pensions Committee

Second Report - Benefit levels in the UK

Work and Pensions Committee HC 142 Published 21 March 2024
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
19 items (11 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 19 of 19 classified
Accepted 6
Acknowledged 2
Deferred 2
Rejected 9
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations

1 result
3 Deferred
Para 69

Outline principles to guide benefit policy design and inform benefit level setting after consultation

Recommendation
Discussion on the adequacy of benefit levels can often be sidetracked by debate on whether it is possible to define essential costs or needs. We agree that it would be a useful first measure for the Government to set out … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government defers its response to be considered in conjunction with its response to recommendation 4.
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →

Conclusions (1)

Observations and findings
9 Conclusion Deferred
There is a persuasive case that there should be a greater number of levels of support provided through PIP—both higher and lower—to reflect more accurately the experiences of claimants. The Department should introduce further levels of support through PIP and the new Health Element of Universal Credit in time for …
Government Response Summary
The government deflected the recommendation, stating that a recently published Green Paper on modernising support for independent living is considering how to effectively support people with long-term health conditions and disabilities.
View Details →