Source · Select Committees · Work and Pensions Committee
Recommendation 4
4
Rejected
Paragraph: 89
Outline clear benchmarks for income-replacement benefits, relating to living costs and work incentives
Recommendation
DWP is clear that benefit levels and the design of benefit policy are intended to incentivise work. This is welcome. The Department does not however directly acknowledge the other purpose of benefits: to provide financial support for living costs to jobseekers, people with low earnings, and to those who are unable to or not expected to work. We find this surprising given that the cost associated with benefits is significant—to claimants, to the taxpayer and across Government spending. Setting out clear, measurable objectives and a benchmark for benefit levels linked to living costs would enable DWP to measure progress and improve accountability in the system. DWP should outline a clear benchmark for income-replacement benefits (such as Universal Credit) which relates to living costs as well as incentivising work. When deciding what benefit levels ought to achieve and/or prevent in relation to living costs, the Department could, for example, consider the methodology used in the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Trussell Trust’s ‘Essentials Guarantee’. The Government should then present a statement of objectives for these benefits within the first session of the next Parliament.
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation, stating it does not intend to establish a benchmark for income-replacement benefits.
Paragraph Reference:
89
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
As outlined in the response to Recommendations 3 and 4, the Government does not intend to establish a benchmark for income-replacement benefits.