Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee
Conclusion 10
Third Report - Defined benefit pension schemes
Published 26 Mar 2024
Paragraph 89
Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Work and Pensions Committee Defined benefit pension schemes All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Improvements in scheme funding have given new prominence to the question of how to treat any surplus in the best interests of scheme beneficiaries. For example, there may be discretion after benefits have been secured on buy-out to enhance benefits before returning any remaining surplus to the employer. There may be options allowing scheme members and employers to benefit from surplus in a continuing scheme. Decisions can be for trustees, the employer, or both, in accordance with scheme rules. We heard from scheme members concerns that their interests would be overlooked in this process. DWP and TPR should explore ways to ensure that scheme members’ reasonable expectations for benefit enhancement are met, particularly where there has been a history of discretionary increases.
From: Work and Pensions Committee, Third Report - Defined benefit pension schemes (HC 144), paragraph 89, 26 March 2024
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 30 April 2025 (deadline 26 May 2024).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government says it has "addressed all of the Committee's recommendations", supporting some DB reforms and committing to consult or respond on others, while declining to make certain changes, such as replacing TPR's PPF objective or offering specific redress to AEAT members.
- On surplus, the government committed on 28 January 2025 to give trustees and sponsoring employers the flexibility to use DB surplus, and says it "will respond formally" to the 'Options for Defined Benefit Schemes' consultation "in the Spring".
- It agrees it is important that regulation does not make schemes too risk averse, but says "we do not believe that TPR's PPF objective is a key factor in employer decision-making", and the review it cites "did not recommend changing this objective".
- On the PPF levy, it announced on 30 January 2025 that it "will consider" giving the PPF Board greater flexibility to adjust the levy. On pre-1997 indexation for PPF and FAS members, it says Ministers "continue to take advice on options" and that it "will provide further detail in due course".
- On governance, it intends to run a public consultation "later this year", including on accreditation and support for lay trustees, and says it is introducing a Superfund authorisation framework in the forthcoming Pension Schemes Bill. On the AEAT scheme it states: "There are no plans to offer specific redress to AEAT members."