Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

Conclusion 8

Third Report - Defined benefit pension schemes Published 26 Mar 2024 Paragraph 74 Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We remain to be convinced that the PPF underpin would be an effective incentive to trustees to consider increasing their investment risk. DWP and TPR should consider whether there are changes to the funding regime that could give trustees confidence to take appropriate investment risk.

From: Work and Pensions Committee, Third Report - Defined benefit pension schemes (HC 144), paragraph 74, 26 March 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 30 April 2025 (deadline 26 May 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it has "addressed all of the Committee's recommendations", supporting some DB reforms and committing to consult or respond on others, while declining to make certain changes, such as replacing TPR's PPF objective or offering specific redress to AEAT members.

  • On surplus, the government committed on 28 January 2025 to give trustees and sponsoring employers the flexibility to use DB surplus, and says it "will respond formally" to the 'Options for Defined Benefit Schemes' consultation "in the Spring".
  • It agrees it is important that regulation does not make schemes too risk averse, but says "we do not believe that TPR's PPF objective is a key factor in employer decision-making", and the review it cites "did not recommend changing this objective".
  • On the PPF levy, it announced on 30 January 2025 that it "will consider" giving the PPF Board greater flexibility to adjust the levy. On pre-1997 indexation for PPF and FAS members, it says Ministers "continue to take advice on options" and that it "will provide further detail in due course".
  • On governance, it intends to run a public consultation "later this year", including on accreditation and support for lay trustees, and says it is introducing a Superfund authorisation framework in the forthcoming Pension Schemes Bill. On the AEAT scheme it states: "There are no plans to offer specific redress to AEAT members."

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error