Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

Recommendation 18

First Report: DWP's response to the coronavirus outbreak Published 22 Jun 2020 Paragraph 103 Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The Department told us that it expects the numbers of people affected by this problem to be “very small”. It based this claim on pre-crisis, pre-uplift trends in benefit cap data. While it is helpful that the Department collects and uses this data, it seems to have little bearing on the current, exceptional situation. We recommend that the Department publish the details of how it arrived at this assessment.

From: Work and Pensions Committee, First Report: DWP's response to the coronavirus outbreak (HC 178), paragraph 103, 22 June 2020

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 8 September 2020.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response sets out DWP's actions on the Committee's recommendations, committing to some further work on health assessments, terminal illness guidance and publishing evidence on the self-employed, while giving reasons for not changing other policies.

  • On legacy benefits, DWP has "no plans to increase these benefits further at this stage", and says rates will be reviewed in the autumn up-rating exercise for April 2021.
  • On audio recording of assessments, the government says it is "currently developing an approach" for telephone PIP assessments and Work Capability Assessments, without stating a date.
  • On health and safety inspections, it says a "new rigid numerical target system would hamper the effectiveness and flexibility of operations" and that HSE uses a risk based, intelligence led approach.
  • On the Employment Bill, the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy "will bring forward detailed proposals on legislation in due course"; DWP "will look to publish evidence on the self-employed".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error