Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

Recommendation 8

Fifth report - Protecting pension savers—five years on from the Pension Freedoms: Accessing pension savings Published 18 Jan 2022 Paragraph 35 Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Money and Pensions Service and the Financial Conduct Authority should develop proposals to increase the number of people choosing a mix of retirement products—including cash, drawdown and deferred annuities—to meet their changing needs at different stages of later life.

From: Work and Pensions Committee, Fifth report - Protecting pension savers—five years on from the Pension Freedoms: Accessing pension savings (HC 237), paragraph 35, 18 January 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 27 April 2022 (deadline 18 March 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government "notes" the Committee's report, commits to a call for evidence in May 2022 on occupational scheme decumulation, and declines several recommendations, including automatic Pension Wise bookings, a usage goal and annual reporting.

  • On Pension Wise, the government "disagree[s] with the proposal to automatically book Pension Wise appointments", citing risks of inappropriate guidance and disengagement; it does "not support setting a goal" for combined use of Pension Wise and paid-for advice.
  • It commits to a Stronger Nudge, in force from 1 June 2022, requiring schemes to offer to book a Pension Wise appointment for members accessing defined contribution benefits.
  • On trust-based schemes, it says it would "not be appropriate" to introduce investment pathways-style requirements until more is known, and DWP intends to issue a call for evidence in May 2022.
  • It believes an annual assessment of pension freedoms and annual reporting on pensions advice "is not necessary" at this time, but will "keep this recommendation under review".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error