Source · Select Committees · Work and Pensions Committee
Recommendation 16
16
Paragraph: 65
We welcome efforts to reduce unnecessary reassessments for people whose conditions or needs are unlikely...
Conclusion
We welcome efforts to reduce unnecessary reassessments for people whose conditions or needs are unlikely to change. However, ESA/UC and PIP are different benefits with different purposes, and this must be reflected in any criteria for reassessment. The Department should adopt a version of the severe conditions criteria for PIP, effectively ending the need for reassessment as it does in ESA/UC. If this is achieved through the Severe Disability Group, which the Department is currently testing, the criteria must be developed to recognise the differences between ESA/UC and PIP, and not focus solely on a claimant’s ability to work.
Paragraph Reference:
65
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 26 June 2023. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗