Select committee: Women and Equalities Committee
9th Report - The use of non-disclosure agreements in discrimination cases
HC 1720
Published 11 June 2019
Women and Equalities Committee The use of non-disclosure agreements in discrimination cases inquiry Report on parliament.uk ↗
At a glanceGovernment response published 29 October 2019
The government's response
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.
The government welcomes the report and agrees it is unacceptable for discrimination cases to be covered up by NDAs, while also stating that NDAs have a "legitimate place" and setting out its own reforms.
- It has committed to legislate so that NDAs cannot prevent disclosures to the police, regulated health and care professionals and legal professionals, and must clearly set out their limitations.
- On a mandatory duty to investigate all complaints, it agrees employers should investigate but prefers "some flexibility", and will consider the proposal further with stakeholders.
- It does not support naming specific directors for NDA and anti-discrimination oversight, citing a risk to collective board responsibility, and says the whole Board should have that responsibility.
- It has not taken forward making it a criminal offence to propose certain clauses, saying existing and proposed measures are proportionate, but "remains open to considering stronger sanctions in the future".
What the committee recommended
No recommendations or conclusions have been extracted from this report. This is normal for correspondence and for special reports.
Sources
- 9th Report - The use of non-disclosure agreements in discrimination cases ↗The committee's report, HC 1720, parliament.uk
- 2nd Special Report - The use of non-disclosure agreements in discrimination cases: Government response to the Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2017–19 ↗The government's response, 29 October 2019, parliament.uk