Source · Select Committees · Women and Equalities Committee
Recommendation 17
17
Rejected
Paragraph: 135
Transparency around the operation and decision-making of the Gender Recognition Panel is a concern to...
Recommendation
Transparency around the operation and decision-making of the Gender Recognition Panel is a concern to many people applying for a Gender Recognition Certificate. It is clear to us that the existence of the Panel itself can, at times, discourage people from applying for a GRC. We believe that another system should exist in place of the Gender Recognition Panel which allows for greater transparency. We note Scotland’s proposed changes to replace the Gender Recognition Panel with the Registrar General for Scotland and we believe this could be a move in the right direction. We heard conflicting evidence on whether the Gender Recognition Panel is providing the feedback that it is supposed to. We recommend that the Government conduct a review on whether the Gender Recognition Panel could be removed and replaced with the Registrar General for England and Wales, who already has a number of existing functions under the Gender Recognition Act. In the interim, more needs to be done to improve the transparency around the operation and role of the Panel. The GEO should satisfy itself that the Panel is carrying out its feedback requirements in line with the GRA and provide reassurance in response to this report. We recommend that the Government conduct a review on whether the Gender Recognition Panel could be removed and replaced with the Registrar General for England and Wales, who already has a number of existing functions under the Gender Recognition Act. In the interim, more needs to be done to improve the transparency around the operation Reform of the Gender Recognition Act 75 and role of the Panel. The GEO should satisfy itself that the Panel is carrying out its feedback requirements in line with the GRA and provide reassurance in response to this report
Government response summary AI-generated
The government rejects the recommendation to replace the Gender Recognition Panel or conduct a review of its structure, stating it is satisfied the Panel is fulfilling its duties and that a replacement would not be appropriate. It highlights existing efforts to simplify the application process.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Paragraph Reference:
135
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government · verbatim extract
Rejected
33. We are satisfied that the Gender Recognition Panel is fulfilling its duties and we will not be amending its structure. Since its inception in 2005, the Panel has refused less than 5% of applications. This does not suggest that the hurdles are too great, or that the system is unsuitable.
Read the full response on Parliament ↗