Select committee: Women and Equalities Committee

Recommendation 14

Third report- Reform of the Gender Recognition Act Published 21 Dec 2021 Paragraph 117 Addressed to Government Equalities Office
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We recommend the requirement for spousal consent should be removed. When an application is made, the non-transitioning spouse should be notified by the body 74 Reform of the Gender Recognition Act processing the application (currently the Gender Recognition Panel) that their transitioning spouse has applied for a Certificate. The non-transitioning spouse should be given the option to either remain married/in a civil partnership or have the marriage/civil partnership annulled. If the spouse opts for an annulment, or does not respond, the body granting the certificate should issue an annulment at the same time as a full Gender Recognition Certificate, subject to appropriate safeguards. The transitioning spouse should also have the option to annul the marriage or partnership but not before the granting body is satisfied that the non-transitioning spouse is aware of the process. The body issuing the certificate will need to be given the power to issue annulments. Any connected matters, such as applications by either spouse for a financial order, should be dealt with by the family courts.

From: Women and Equalities Committee, Third report- Reform of the Gender Recognition Act (HC 977), paragraph 117, 21 December 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 24 March 2022 (deadline 21 February 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government states that its September 2020 position on the Gender Recognition Act "is right and appropriate" and that it will not change the legislation, while pointing to administrative improvements such as the fee cut and digitisation.

  • On the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, the government declines to remove it, saying the requirements ensure the process is "rigorous", but says it will amend the reference to a "disorder" via a remedial order "in due course".
  • It does not consider it necessary to change the statutory declaration, and considers it "equitable" for spousal consent to remain, as it is a safeguard for the non-transitioning spouse.
  • It says the digital application process is in testing and "will be operational by summer 2022", and that applicants can still use the paper process if they prefer.
  • It does not consider a formal healthcare strategy for transgender and non-binary people necessary, while DHSC says it is "happy to provide the Committee with annual updates" on the pilot clinics' progress and waiting times.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error