Select Committee · Women and Equalities Committee

Tackling non-consensual intimate image abuse

Status: Closed Opened: 28 Mar 2024 Closed: 15 Jan 2026 23 recommendations 5 conclusions 1 report

This inquiry examines the impact of non-consensual intimate image (NCII) abuse on victims, and what steps internet platforms and the Government are taking to prevent and tackle NCII. It will also consider the extent to which the Online Safety Act, which received royal assent in October 2023, will be effective in tackling NCII.

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
4th Report – Tackling non-consensual intimate image abuse HC 336 5 Mar 2025 28 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

8 items
8 Recommendation 4th Report – Tackling non-consensual in… Accepted in Part

Create guidance for internet providers and web browsers on tackling non-consensual intimate image abuse.

The Government should create guidance for internet infrastructure providers and web browser manufacturers on tackling online non-consensual intimate image abuse, similar to that which already exists for online child sexual exploitation and abuse. This guidance should direct both groups to make use of a designated expert body’s registry of NCII …

Government response. The government partially accepts the recommendation, stating it will explore the feasibility of producing specific guidance for internet infrastructure providers and web browser manufacturers, and notes existing measures under the Online Safety Act and Data (Use and Access) Bill to …
Government Equalities Office
18 Recommendation 4th Report – Tackling non-consensual in… Accepted in Part

Introduce statutory time limit extension for intimate image abuse, starting from victim awareness.

The Government should introduce an extension to the statutory time limits that apply to current and forthcoming intimate image abuse offences, such that the time limit begins only once the victim(s) is/are aware of the abuse. (Recommendation, Paragraph 93)

Government response. The government partially accepts, stating it is extending the statutory time limit for the new 'creating' and 'requesting the creation of' intimate image offences in the Data (Use and Access) Bill. It is considering the issue very carefully for other …
Government Equalities Office
19 Recommendation 4th Report – Tackling non-consensual in… Accepted in Part

Police treatment of intimate image abuse victims demonstrates lack of understanding and misogyny.

Every victim of a sexual offence deserves to be treated with respect and have their case investigated promptly and effectively by the police. However, in many cases police treatment of victims of intimate image abuse has been characterised by a lack of understanding and in some cases misogyny, with officers’ …

Government response. The government partially accepts, outlining new College of Policing guidance on online image offending, existing core learning for officers, and over £13m funding for a new National Centre for VAWG and Public Protection. This Centre will develop and deliver improved …
Government Equalities Office
20 Recommendation 4th Report – Tackling non-consensual in… Accepted in Part

Produce joint guidance to improve police response and content takedown for intimate image abuse.

The College of Policing, Ofcom, and the Revenge Porn Helpline should work together to produce guidance to improve the police response to reports of non-consensual intimate image abuse. That guidance should include the steps police officers need to take to help ensure that content is taken down and blocked as …

Government response. The government partially accepts, noting the College of Policing has already issued new guidance on online image offending. They are providing £13m funding for a new National Centre for VAWG and Public Protection, which will develop and deliver improved training, …
Government Equalities Office
21 Conclusion 4th Report – Tackling non-consensual in… Accepted in Part

Perpetrators of non-consensual intimate image abuse retain content-bearing devices post-conviction.

Cases have been drawn to our attention where, at the end of the criminal justice process, perpetrators have had the devices containing the NCII content returned to them—even in cases where the perpetrator has been 55 served with a restraining order. It is needless for us to say how harrowing …

Government response. The government partially accepts the implied recommendation to address perpetrators retaining NCII content. It confirms the Ministry of Justice already collects and will continue to review data on deprivation orders in NCII cases, and notes the CPS has updated guidance …
Government Equalities Office
22 Recommendation 4th Report – Tackling non-consensual in… Accepted in Part

Increase courts' use of deprivation orders to prevent perpetrators retaining intimate images.

The Sentencing Council must take steps to increase awareness of the ability of the courts to ensure that those charged with NCII offences forfeit all right to continued possession of that material, including both the physical removal of devices on which that material may be stored and deletion of any …

Government response. The government partially accepts, committing to continue reviewing data on deprivation orders in NCII cases, which it already collects. However, it cannot comment on the recommendations for the independent CPS and Sentencing Council, though it notes their updated guidance and …
Government Equalities Office
25 Recommendation 4th Report – Tackling non-consensual in… Accepted in Part

Accept StopNCII.org hash matching technology as a matter of priority.

Google should accept the StopNCII.org hash matching technology as a matter of priority. (Recommendation, Paragraph 125)

Government response. The government partially accepts, stating Google is able to consider adopting StopNCII.org hash-matching technology and the government would support its use. It notes that Ofcom, the online safety regulator, has powers to set out steps for search services and will …
Government Equalities Office
27 Recommendation 4th Report – Tackling non-consensual in… Accepted in Part

Mandate consent-based offence for deepfake creation, including cultural intimate image abuse.

The Government’s plans to criminalise the creation of sexually explicit deepfakes/NCII, even if they are not shared, are very welcome and worthy of praise. However, the Government must ensure that the offence is consent- based and does not require the determination of any motivation on the part of the perpetrator. …

Government response. The government has introduced a consent-based offence for non-consensual sexually explicit deepfakes without requiring a motivation element, with amendments tabled to the Data (Use and Access) Bill. However, they have not included culturally sensitive images in this offence.
Government Equalities Office

Oral evidence sessions

3 sessions
Date Witnesses
20 Nov 2024 Alex Davies-Jones · Ministry of Justice, Gisela Carr · Home Office, Jess Phillips MP · Home Office, Laura Weight · Ministry of Justice, Professor Clare McGlynn · University of Durham, Professor Lorna Woods · Essex Law School, University of Essex, Samantha Millar · National Police Chiefs' Council View ↗
6 Nov 2024 Courtney Gregoire · Microsoft, David Wright · SWGfL, Gail Kent · Google, Sophie Mortimer · Revenge Porn Helpline View ↗
8 May 2024 David Wright · The UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC), Georgia Harrison, Keily Blair · Only Fans View ↗

Correspondence

29 letters
DateDirectionTitle
14 Jan 2026 Correspondence from Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice re, Crim…
14 Jan 2026 Correspondence with Chief Executive, Ofcom, re, Non-consensual intimate image a…
17 Jun 2025 Correspondence from Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice…
4 Jun 2025 Correspondence to Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice r…
7 May 2025 Correspondence from Vice President and Chief Digital Safety Officer, Microsoft,…
3 Apr 2025 Correspondence to Vice President and Chief Digital Safety Officer, relating to …
26 Feb 2025 Correspondence from Minister, Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls…
12 Feb 2025 Correspondence from the Minister for Victims and Violence Against Women and Gir…
6 Feb 2025 Correspondence with Chief Executive, Ofcom re tackling non-consensual intimate …
28 Jan 2025 Correspondence from Minister of State of Justice, re, Tackling non-consensual i…
8 Jan 2025 Correspondence from Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice…
11 Dec 2024 Correspondence with the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority
24 May 2024 Correspondence from SWGfL, relating to the session on non-consensual intimate i…
24 May 2024 Correspondence to the Home Secretary, Secretary of State for Science, Innovatio…
10 May 2024 Correspondence to Minister for Victims and Safeguarding, relating to Non-consen…
8 May 2024 Correspondence to Ofcom, relating to non-consensual intimate image abuse, dated…
8 May 2024 Correspondence from X (formerly Twitter), relating to tackling non-consensual i…
8 May 2024 Correspondence from Patreon, relating to tacking non-consensual intimate image …
8 May 2024 Correspondence from Ofcom , relating to non-consensual intimate image abuse, da…
24 Apr 2024 Correspondence from Match Group, relating to tackling non-consensual intimate i…