Source · Select Committees · Treasury Committee

First Report - Future of financial services regulation

Treasury Committee HC 141 Published 16 June 2022
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
25 items (12 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 25 of 25 classified
Accepted 6
Accepted in Part 2
Acknowledged 16
Deferred 1
Government response
Second Special Report - Future of financial services regulation: responses to the Committee’s First Report · published 7 Sep 2022
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 items
18 Conclusion Accepted in Part

We expect the regulators to prioritise changes where the cost for consumers is lowest in...

Conclusion
We expect the regulators to prioritise changes where the cost for consumers is lowest in comparison to the benefit. Regulators’ approaches to assessing the marginal impact of new policies is already well-developed. We therefore believe that the creation of a … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges concerns about regulators' cost-benefit analysis and proposes establishing CBA panels but does not agree that the panels would impact the regulators' independence.
HM Treasury
View Details →
23 Recommendation Accepted in Part
Para 154

The Prudential Regulation Authority should consider where there is more that can be done to...

Recommendation
The Prudential Regulation Authority should consider where there is more that can be done to reduce the advantages from which large banks and insurers benefit through modelling their own capital requirements. The purpose of doing so would be not only … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with simplifying the regulatory framework, citing the "Strong & Simple" initiative and insurance reporting simplifications, and highlights planned enhancements to cost-benefit analysis, but does not specifically address reducing advantages from modelling capital requirements.
HM Treasury
View Details →