Source · Select Committees · Treasury Committee

Second Report - Edinburgh Reforms One Year On: Has Anything Changed?

Treasury Committee HC 221 Published 8 December 2023
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
18 items (3 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 9 of 18 classified
Accepted 1
Not Addressed 2
Rejected 6
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations

1 result
6 Not Addressed
Para 35

Continue monitoring market impact of the new consolidated tape by Government and regulators.

Recommendation
The Sub-Committee remains sceptical that a government-approved monopoly for providing data to market participants through a consolidated tape is good for competition. Once a monopoly were granted, the incumbent would have little incentive to reduce costs or to innovate. Given … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government notes that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published rules for a UK consolidated tape for bonds, but does not directly address the recommendation to monitor its impact on market forces.
HM Treasury
View Details →

Conclusions (10)

Observations and findings
2 Conclusion
Para 18
The Sub-Committee agrees with the Treasury that the UK’s regulators should consider economic growth when designing new regulations, and the best way to promote economic growth in the UK is through a strong, well respected, independently regulated, and financially resilient financial services sector.
View Details →
3 Conclusion Not Addressed
Para 21
The Sub-Committee has raised concerns with the FCA about the risks to widening retail investment in Long-Term Asset Funds, since they are riskier non-liquid assets. These concerns are in part formed by our work looking into the failure of London Capital and Finance, and the role of promoters in potentially …
Government Response Summary
The government's response focuses on the Advice Guidance Boundary Review consultation to improve consumer access to affordable advice in the retail investment market, without directly addressing the specific concerns raised about Long-Term Asset Funds and protections against misuse of investor exemptions.
View Details →
4 Conclusion
Para 23
In our July 2023 report on venture capital funding we concluded that we were in favour of pension scheme consolidation where appropriate. Our view has not changed since. We therefore restate our conclusion on pension scheme consolidation in this report:
View Details →
5 Conclusion
Para 24
Our evidence suggests that UK pension funds may be an untapped source for a deeper domestic capital market more inclined to risk investment in high-potential businesses. We welcome the Government’s announcement of work on pension fund consolidation in the autumn. We will scrutinise the details of those proposals closely. Any …
View Details →
8 Conclusion
Para 42
Based on the evidence the Sub-Committee has heard, there is the potential for small changes to the ring-fencing framework to improve its interoperability with the PRA’s resolution regime, but any longer-term plans to eventually remove the ring-fencing regime entirely should only be entertained once substantial evidence of what benefits this …
View Details →
9 Conclusion
Para 46
The continued viability of building societies and mutuals is of high importance to the Committee. A diverse, competitive and vibrant financial services sector is strengthened by the presence of mutuals and building societies.
View Details →
10 Conclusion
Para 47
Given that Parliament has expressed its will through the Mutual Deferred Shares Act 2015 that building societies should be able to raise finance through mutually deferred shares, the Committee expects the Government to address the lack of progress made on the secondary implementing legislation as part of its Edinburgh Reforms …
View Details →
11 Conclusion
There is consensus among the Treasury, industry, and the Financial Conduct Authority that there are problems within the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPS) regime in addition to a wider problem with cost disclosures. Such an example can be found with investment companies, where EU- derived regulation, since removed …
View Details →
17 Conclusion
Para 58
The Sub-Committee notes the proposed establishment of a Lord’s Committee on Financial Service Regulation. While its remit is a matter for the House of Lords, duplication of work should be avoided. The Sub-Committee will continue to carry out its scrutiny of new regulatory consultations as and when they are published. …
View Details →
18 Conclusion
The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 legislated for the creation of Cost Benefit (CBA) Panels dedicated to supporting the regulators in producing cost benefit analysis for each of their reforms. The Sub-Committee has consistently been of the view that the regulators’ cost benefit analysis did not capture the full …
View Details →