Select committee: Treasury Committee

Conclusion 22

1st Report – Student loans: Broken and unfair? Published 7 Jul 2026 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
When asked about its compliance with the ‘red hand doctrine’, the SLC’s defence was that a student loan is not contractual, so it need not comply, and that in any case legal responsibility for its application forms actually lies with the Secretary of State for Education. When we asked Baroness Smith about previous mis-selling, however, she argued that the SLC had apologised. (Conclusion, Paragraph 87)

From: Treasury Committee, 1st Report – Student loans: Broken and unfair? (HC 14), 7 July 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 13 September 2026 (deadline 7 September 2026).

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error