Select committee: Treasury Committee

Recommendation 10

Eleventh Report - Economic impact of coronavirus: gaps in support and economic analysis Published 15 Feb 2021 Paragraph 63 Addressed to HM Treasury
Recommendation (the committee's words)
There is a striking inconsistency between the way the Government is treating employees earning more than £50,000 a year and those who are self-employed and have trading profits above £50,000 a year. Whereas those who are employed can receive support from the Government up to a maximum wage amount of £2,500 a month through the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, those who are self-employed receive nothing at all under the Self-employment Income Support Scheme. This is unfair. We believe the Government ought not to disadvantage the self-employed in this way.

From: Treasury Committee, Eleventh Report - Economic impact of coronavirus: gaps in support and economic analysis (HC 882), paragraph 63, 15 February 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 26 April 2021 (deadline 15 April 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Treasury's response sets out the support it has provided and extended, says it has addressed the GDP commentary recommendation in the Budget, and says it cannot identify or fairly support limited company directors or change key SEISS eligibility rules.

  • On the recommendation for a commentary on GDP as a measure, the Government says it "has addressed this recommendation in the Budget", which features a commentary on international comparisons of economic performance and the use of GDP as a measure.
  • The Government has extended CJRS and SEISS "even further, until September", and moved the CJRS employee cut-off date to 2 March 2021 for claims starting on 1 May 2021.
  • On limited company directors, the Government says the Directors Income Support Scheme proposal "is not workable in its current form" because HMRC does not hold the necessary information, and cites fraud and error risks, with a draft planning assumption that these "could be as high as 20%".
  • On SEISS eligibility, the Government says the 50% self-employed income test and the £50,000 threshold are intended to target support. It does not think a taper is "proportionate", given complexity and the small number who would benefit.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error