Select committee: Treasury Committee
Conclusion 9
Twelfth Report - Tax after coronavirus
Published 1 Mar 2021
Paragraph 70
Addressed to HM Treasury
Treasury Committee Tax after coronavirus All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Some firms and sectors have seen a significant increase in turnover as a result of the pandemic, and some witnesses made arguments in favour of a windfall tax on the profits which have resulted. There are downsides to a windfall tax, including its potentially retrospective nature. There would also be complexities, including the difficulties of identifying sectors to which any such tax should apply, ensuring that such a tax is fairly targeted at firms which have benefited excessively within those sectors, and identifying the element of a firm’s profits which could be reasonably attributed to excessive profits generated by the pandemic. For these reasons, introducing such a tax would be problematic, but that is not to say that it would be impossible to introduce a windfall tax in certain circumstances in the future, if that was the political choice made. The Treasury would clearly need to conduct a thorough assessment of its feasibility and of the revenue which it might raise.
From: Treasury Committee, Twelfth Report - Tax after coronavirus (HC 664), paragraph 70, 1 March 2021
Government response
No government response linked yet: deadline 1 May 2021, 2010 days ago.