Select committee: Treasury Committee
Conclusion 11
First Report - Future of financial services regulation
Published 16 Jun 2022
Paragraph 89
Addressed to HM Treasury
Treasury Committee Future of Financial Services All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The regulations made by the FCA, and the manner in which it supervises and enforces those regulations, could have a significant impact on financial inclusion. However a primary role of the FCA should not be to carry out social policy, or to fill the gaps where it is Government that ought to be stepping in and addressing these issues. Government, community, and individuals all have a role to play in tackling poverty, an issue which is far broader than regulation.
From: Treasury Committee, First Report - Future of financial services regulation (HC 141), paragraph 89, 16 June 2022
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 7 September 2022 (deadline 16 August 2022).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.HM Treasury "notes" each of the Committee's recommendations, setting out the measures in the Financial Services and Markets Bill and, in places, explaining why it does not take the approach the Committee suggested.
- On secondary objectives, the government notes the recommendation and says Clause 24 of the FSM Bill implements new secondary objectives for the FCA and PRA on medium to long-term growth and competitiveness, subject to regulators "aligning with relevant international standards".
- On financial inclusion, it does not consider that a separate 'have regard' for the FCA "would lead to a different approach or tangible improvements over the current arrangements", noting that government already publishes an annual report.
- On a forward schedule for moving EU files to the rulebooks, it recognises that further information on the programme is important and "expects to set out further information in due course".
- On Treasury funding of rule reviews, it notes the recommendation and says the Bill requires the Treasury to 'have regard' to minimising the impact of a direction on the regulator's other functions. On CBA panels, it "does not agree" they would impact regulators' independence.