Source · Select Committees · Treasury Committee
Recommendation 16
16
Rejected
Paragraph: 77
Consult on higher funding limits for EIS and VCT schemes to support scale-up businesses.
Recommendation
HM Treasury should consult on higher funding limits on the EIS and VCT schemes with the objective of better supporting scale-up businesses. These revised limits should take effect from the renewal of the sunset clauses in April 2025.
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the importance of supporting scale-up businesses and highlights existing support through the British Business Bank and British Patient Capital. However, it rejects consulting on higher funding limits for EIS and VCT schemes, arguing that such revisions would risk undermining policy rationale, displacing investment, and reducing value for money.
Paragraph Reference:
77
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
HM Treasury has carefully considered the Committee’s recommendation. Supporting scale up businesses to grow and prosper is important and the government continues to do this in a number of ways. The British Business Bank continues to support start-ups and scale-up businesses throughout their growth development through a variety of interventions. For example, in 2018, British Patient Capital, a commercial subsidy of the British Business Bank, was launched following the government’s Patient Capital Review. The review found that whilst the UK provides a fertile ground for innovation to thrive, a lack of access to long-term finance, or patient capital, has prevented some UK companies from scaling up and fulfilling their full commercial potential. British Patient Capital was created with an initial £2.5 billion fund to invest over 10 years in venture and venture growth capital. In 2021, two new products were introduced, the £200 million Life Sciences Investment Programme and the £375 million Future Fund: Breakthrough programme for direct investment into R&D intensive companies. At Spring Budget 2023, the government extended British Patient Capital to 2033‒34. At the Mansion House speech in July, the Chancellor announced an ambitious package which reforms the pensions market to boost returns and improve outcomes for pension fund holders whilst increasing funding liquidity for high-growth companies. The Mansion House Compact saw 9 of the UK’s largest defined contribution pension providers commit to the objective of allocating 5% of their default funds to unlisted equities by 2030. Should the ambition to allocate 5% to unlisted equities be replicated across all defined contribution workplace schemes, it could unlock £50 billion of finance by 2030, which could support the UK’s most innovative, high-growth businesses to grow and secure their future in the UK. HM Treasury disagrees with the Committee’s recommendation that the Treasury should consult on higher funding limits within the EIS and VCT schemes with the objective of better supporting scale up businesses. The schemes are popular and world leading in terms of their generosity, with over £3.6 billion funds raised across the three tax-advantaged venture capital schemes (SEIS, EIS and VCT) in 2021‒22. The schemes are designed and targeted to meet an identified market failure. These schemes are kept under review to ensure the limits are appropriate and effectively targeted to meet this specific market failure. This includes reviews as part of HMRC’s published tax relief evaluation plan. Revising the funding limits of the schemes to target them towards scale-up businesses risks undermining the policy rationale and could displace investment away from those they are targeted to support. This would increase deadweight in the schemes, reducing value for money. Extending the schemes in a way that reduced value for money would be inconsistent with HM Treasury’s aim to ensure the reliefs are effective and well targeted.