Source · Select Committees · Transport Committee

Fourth Report - Road pricing

Transport Committee HC 789 Published 4 February 2022
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
17 items (12 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 17 of 17 classified
Accepted 3
Acknowledged 1
Not Addressed 11
Rejected 2
Government response
Third Special Report - Road Pricing: Government Response to the Committee’s Fourth Report of Session 2021–22 · published 6 Mar 2023
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 items
3 Recommendation Rejected
Para 9

To promote fairness and public acceptance, any alternative road charging mechanism must (a) entirely replace...

Recommendation
To promote fairness and public acceptance, any alternative road charging mechanism must (a) entirely replace fuel duty and vehicle excise duty rather than being added alongside those taxes; and (b) be revenue neutral with most motorists paying the same or … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it does not have further views on the committee's recommendations regarding the ways road pricing should be considered.
Department for Transport
View Details →
6 Recommendation Rejected
Para 19

In designing a replacement for fuel duty and vehicle excise duty, the Government must examine...

Recommendation
In designing a replacement for fuel duty and vehicle excise duty, the Government must examine how an alternative road pricing mechanism can use price as a lever for change while subjecting motorists to fair levels of taxation. To that end, … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government does not have further views on the Committee’s recommendations for the ways in which road pricing should be considered.
Department for Transport
View Details →