Source · Select Committees · Transport Committee

Sixth Report - Strategic road investment

Transport Committee HC 904 Published 27 July 2023
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
14 items (7 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 14 of 14 classified
Accepted 4
Accepted in Part 2
Acknowledged 2
Deferred 4
Rejected 2
Filter by: Clear

Conclusions (2)

Observations and findings
3 Conclusion Acknowledged
Para 20
In our recent report on Implementation of the National Bus Strategy we recommended that a debate needs to be had about whether the Department for Transport should introduce a target to reduce car usage in England by the end of the decade, such as those seen in Scotland and Wales. …
Government Response Summary
The government stated it agrees with the recommendation that a debate is needed on introducing a car usage reduction target for England. However, the response then outlined existing investment in strategic road network maintenance and upgrades, without specifying how the debate would be facilitated or a target considered.
View Details →
9 Conclusion Acknowledged
Para 52
Throughout RIS 1 and 2, there has been a consistent theme of overly ambitious portfolio planning, and National Highways has overspent and underdelivered. Despite delays in RIS 1, an even more ambitious portfolio was chosen for RIS 2. Schemes have been consistently pushed back into the following RIS portfolio, and …
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the recommendation, stating that deliverability is assessed when setting a RIS and that the ORR has an important role in the process. They highlight actions taken to manage RIS2, including increased staffing and lessons learned from RIS1, and state that they continue to consider investment priorities for RIS3.
View Details →