Select committee: Transport Committee

Conclusion 8

Fifth Report - UK aviation: reform for take-off Published 25 Apr 2022 Paragraph 43 Addressed to Department for Transport
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Under-regulation has resulted in a dysfunctional travel testing market. The travel testing market was established with no clear protections or means of recourse for consumers. To date, the onus has been on consumers to perform market research, which has required them to navigate often misleading claims by companies. Unclear pricing, misleading advertisements and delays in receiving tests and test results still persist more than a year after the Government first introduced travel testing requirements. The Government has been far too slow to address those issues.

From: Transport Committee, Fifth Report - UK aviation: reform for take-off (HC 683), paragraph 43, 25 April 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 11 July 2022 (deadline 25 June 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government's response notes most of the Committee's recommendations, agrees with a small number, partially agrees with others, and points to its new strategic framework, Flightpath to the Future, published on 26 May.

  • On future pandemic planning, the Government "agrees with this recommendation", and says it "will only consider implementing new public health measures at the border in extreme circumstances".
  • On an Airline Insolvency Bill, it "partially accepts" the recommendation: "If a Bill is required, we will work to introduce it as soon as practicable."
  • On CAA financial penalties, it has "noted" the recommendation and will set out next steps "in due course" after reviewing responses to its consultation on additional CAA powers.
  • It does "not agree" that the CMA needs to review the antigen travel test market, nor that the consultation should be expanded to cover the private travel testing market, saying that market has been dealt with separately.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error