Select committee: Transport Committee
Conclusion 7
Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles
Published 15 Sep 2023
Paragraph 79
Addressed to Department for Transport
Transport Committee Self-driving vehicles All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Connected vehicles pose new dangers, which the law must evolve to meet. A safety- led culture will require wide access to data, and this must be a higher priority than commercial confidentiality. Ensuring self-driving vehicles are roadworthy will be more complicated than for conventional vehicles, not least because there is more that can go wrong. Legal liability also becomes more complex as it is shared between owner and operator. The Government explained broadly how its new regulatory regime will work but accepted that more thinking was needed about how this will work in practice.
From: Transport Committee, Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles (HC 519), paragraph 79, 15 September 2023
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 24 November 2023 (deadline 15 November 2023).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government accepts the Committee's recommendations on a gradual introduction of self-driving vehicles and on bringing forward legislation, partially accepts two others, notes one, and does not accept the Committee's view on the safety ambition.
- On legislation, the government "accepts this recommendation" and states it is bringing the Automated Vehicles Bill to the fourth Parliamentary session, as announced in the King's Speech on 7 November 2023.
- It does not accept the Committee's view that the safety threshold should be more stretching. It argues that setting too high a level of ambition "could have the effect of stifling the introduction of the technology", and considers a competent and careful driver standard "an appropriate ambition at this time".
- On driver skills and a strategy for human driving, it "partially accepts". It says work is underway as part of its CAVPASS programme to consider education, training and licensing needs, and changes have already been made to The Highway Code.
- On unresolved policy issues such as data, roadworthiness and liability, it "has noted this recommendation". It points to the Automated Vehicles Bill, with specific requirements to be set out in secondary legislation "subject to public consultation".