Select committee: Transport Committee

Self-driving vehicles

Closed Opened 27 Jun 2022 Closed 24 Nov 2023 6 recommendations 5 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
This inquiry is scrutinising the development and deployment of self-driving vehicles for use on the roads (also known as connected and autonomous vehicles).

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 27 June 2022.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles on 15 September 2023.

The government's response

Published 24 November 2023. The deadline was 15 November 2023.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government accepts the Committee's recommendations on a gradual introduction of self-driving vehicles and on bringing forward legislation, partially accepts two others, notes one, and does not accept the Committee's view on the safety ambition.

  • On legislation, the government "accepts this recommendation" and states it is bringing the Automated Vehicles Bill to the fourth Parliamentary session, as announced in the King's Speech on 7 November 2023.
  • It does not accept the Committee's view that the safety threshold should be more stretching. It argues that setting too high a level of ambition "could have the effect of stifling the introduction of the technology", and considers a competent and careful driver standard "an appropriate ambition at this time".
  • On driver skills and a strategy for human driving, it "partially accepts". It says work is underway as part of its CAVPASS programme to consider education, training and licensing needs, and changes have already been made to The Highway Code.
  • On unresolved policy issues such as data, roadworthiness and liability, it "has noted this recommendation". It points to the Automated Vehicles Bill, with specific requirements to be set out in secondary legislation "subject to public consultation".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions 11 shown

1: Self-driving vehicles offer potential benefits, but progress has been slower than predicted, breeding cynicism.

Conclusion · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Concluded (the committee's words)
There is a broad range of possible uses for self-driving vehicles, and we believe they have the potential to improve transport connectivity with significant safety, productivity, and mobility benefits. However, over the last decade, progress in this technology has failed to meet many of its promoters’ predictions, and this has bred understandable cynicism.

Link to this item · Read this item

2: Expectations for self-driving vehicles are becoming more realistic, with circumscribed forms closer to reality.

Conclusion · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Concluded (the committee's words)
Hopefully expectations of self-driving vehicle technology have become more realistic. Self-driving vehicles that can go anywhere at any time remain purely hypothetical, but in more circumscribed forms they can become reality. Nobody is likely to be taking a self-driving vehicle the whole way from Land’s End to John o’ Groats anytime soon, if ever, but self-driving bus services may become commonplace sooner rather than later.

Link to this item · Read this item

3: Require Government to adopt a cautious, gradual approach to self-driving vehicle introduction.

Recommendation · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Recommended (the committee's words)
In principle we welcome the introduction of self-driving vehicles, but the Government must take a cautious, gradual approach with the technology introduced only in well- defined and appropriate contexts. As such, we broadly welcome the strategy the Government has set out. However, without careful handling, self-driving vehicles could worsen congestion and exacerbate existing inequalities in transport access. The Government must ensure the introduction of self-driving vehicles is responsive to the wider population and meets the UK’s transport goals.

Link to this item · Read this item

4: Require Government to set a clearer, more stretching safety threshold for self-driving vehicles.

Recommendation · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Recommended (the committee's words)
While it is widely assumed that self-driving vehicles will prove safer than human drivers, this is not a given. Optimistic predictions are often based on widespread self- driving vehicle usage that is decades away, or assertions about human error that ignore other risks. Safety must remain the Government’s overriding priority as self-driving vehicles encounter real-world complexity. Given this, we question the Government’s proposed ambition that self-driving vehicles must be as safe as a competent and careful human driver. This is too weak and too vague. The Government should set a clearer, more stretching threshold.

Link to this item · Read this item

5: Require Government to develop a strategy for the future of human driving skills.

Recommendation · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Recommended (the committee's words)
Greater automation will reduce time spent driving. Over time drivers may become less practised and therefore less skilled. Conversely, the demands on drivers will grow as they will be called upon to retake control of vehicles in challenging circumstances with little notice. The Government should set out a strategy for the future of human driving in a world of self-driving vehicles. This should include possible changes to driving tests and a plan to ensure that all drivers fully understand self-driving vehicles and both acquire and maintain the necessary skills for taking control of a vehicle in all circumstances.

Link to this item · Read this item

6: Self-driving vehicles must not impose new burdens on other road users or pedestrians.

Conclusion · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Concluded (the committee's words)
The introduction of self-driving vehicles to the UK’s roads will affect all road users. We believe that this should not impose new responsibilities on other road users and pedestrians, limit their access to, or use of, public infrastructure or, crucially, make them less safe.

Link to this item · Read this item

7: Connected vehicles pose new complex challenges for safety, data access, and legal liability.

Conclusion · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Concluded (the committee's words)
Connected vehicles pose new dangers, which the law must evolve to meet. A safety- led culture will require wide access to data, and this must be a higher priority than commercial confidentiality. Ensuring self-driving vehicles are roadworthy will be more complicated than for conventional vehicles, not least because there is more that can go wrong. Legal liability also becomes more complex as it is shared between owner and operator. The Government explained broadly how its new regulatory regime will work but accepted that more thinking was needed about how this will work in practice.

Link to this item · Read this item

8: Lead efforts to resolve policy issues for safe deployment of self-driving vehicles by 2025.

Recommendation · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government has put good structures in place, but it is not enough just to participate in or facilitate conversations about unresolved policy issues, including access to data, verifying roadworthiness, legal liability and insurance implications. If self-driving vehicles are to be deployed on our roads by 2025, safely and successfully, the Government must take the lead to resolve these issues.

Link to this item · Read this item

9: Integrate self-driving vehicle needs into future infrastructure strategy, addressing current siloed preparations.

Recommendation · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Recommended (the committee's words)
Self-driving vehicles will need well-maintained roads and signage, nationwide connectivity, and up-to-date digital information about the road network. While some steps have been taken towards this by the Government and public bodies, these preparations are too siloed and divorced from broader planning. If the Government is serious about self-driving vehicles, it should ensure meeting their needs is an integral part of future infrastructure strategy.

Link to this item · Read this item

10: Archaic self-driving vehicle laws require urgent reform, making government's legislative delay disappointing.

Conclusion · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Concluded (the committee's words)
The current laws for self-driving vehicles are archaic and limiting, especially concerning testing and legal liability. We commend the work of the Law Commissions and the Government in devising a new legal framework. That framework has broad support, albeit with more detail needed in some areas. This makes it deeply disappointing that the Government will not commit to legislating in this Parliament to put this framework in place.

Link to this item · Read this item

11: Urgently bring forward comprehensive legislation for a robust self-driving vehicle regulatory framework.

Recommendation · Seventh Report - Self-driving vehicles · Addressed to Department for Transport

Recommended (the committee's words)
The self-driving vehicle sector is a British success story. We were impressed, unfailingly so, by the energy, creativity, and expertise of all those we met, whether from industry, academia, Government or somewhere in between. We have a competitive advantage, and we must maintain it. To do this the Government must bring forward and pass comprehensive legislation in the next parliamentary session to put in place the robust regulatory framework it promised. Failing to do so will do significant and lasting damage both to the UK’s self-driving vehicle industry and to this country’s reputation as a trailblazer. We recommend that legislation be brought forward as a matter of urgency, with an expectation that any legislation will have to be regularly reviewed and updated subsequently as technology evolves.

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

3 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
8 Mar 2023
Oral evidence session
Dr Siddartha Khastgir · Warwick Manufacturing Group, Ed Houghton · DG Cities, Lisa Johnson · Starship Technologies, Mr Christian Wolmar, Peter Stephens · Stagecoach, Simon Morgan · Institute of Highway Engineers
View ↗
16 Nov 2022
Oral evidence session
Ashley Feldman · techUK, Becky Guy · Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, Ben Gardner · Pinsent Masons LLP, Ian Wainwright · Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport (CILT), Mark Shepherd · The Association of British Insurers (ABI), Professor Jack Stilgoe · University College London
View ↗
26 Oct 2022
Oral evidence session
David Wong · Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), Dr Alex Kendall · Wayve, Professor Nick Reed · Reed Mobility, Professor Paul Newman · Oxbotica, Steve Gooding · RAC Foundation
View ↗

Who gave evidence

17 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Ashley Feldman · Transport and Smart Cities Programme and Policy Officer techUK 1
Becky Guy · Road Safety Manager Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents 1
Ben Gardner · Senior Associate Pinsent Masons LLP 1
David Wong · Senior Technology and Innovation Manager Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) 1
Dr Alex Kendall · Chief Executive Wayve 1
Dr Siddartha Khastgir · Head of Verification and Validation of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Warwick Manufacturing Group 1
Ed Houghton · Head of Research and Service Design DG Cities 1
Ian Wainwright · Chair of Freight and Logistics Policy Group Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport (CILT) 1
Lisa Johnson · Vice President, Corporate Communications and Public Affairs (Global) Starship Technologies 1
Mark Shepherd · Head of General Insurance Policy The Association of British Insurers (ABI) 1
Mr Christian Wolmar Not recorded 1
Peter Stephens · Policy and External Affairs Director Stagecoach 1
Professor Jack Stilgoe · Professor of Science and Technology Policy University College London 1
Professor Nick Reed · Founder Reed Mobility 1
Professor Paul Newman · Founder and Chief Technology Officer Oxbotica 1
Simon Morgan · Chair of Traffic Signs Panel Institute of Highway Engineers 1
Steve Gooding · Director RAC Foundation 1