Select Committee · Transport Committee

Major transport infrastructure projects: appraisal and delivery

Status: Closed Opened: 4 Dec 2020 Closed: 14 Nov 2022 13 recommendations 5 conclusions 2 reports

Billions of pounds of investment has been committed during 2020 to the UK’s transport infrastructure. This inquiry will consider: transport infrastructure strategy and priorities; the appraisal and funding of transport infrastructure; oversight, accountability and governance of transport infrastructure projects; factors influencing the cost and capacity and skills required to deliver the infrastructure plans. The extent … Show more

Clear

Reports

2 reports
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Second Report - Major transport infrastructure projects HC 24 29 Sep 2021 9 Overdue
Second Report - Major transport infrastructure projects HC 24 29 Sep 2021 9 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

5 items
1 Conclusion Second Report - Major transport infrast… Accepted in Part

Subject to devolved responsibilities, the National Infrastructure Strategy’s top-level objectives of supporting the UK economy...

Subject to devolved responsibilities, the National Infrastructure Strategy’s top-level objectives of supporting the UK economy after coronavirus, addressing regional inequalities and facilitating adaptation to climate change are welcome. However, the Government is yet to articulate the detail on how it will achieve those objectives. Read more

Government response AI summary
The government partially agrees, stating they will not publish a single delivery plan but will articulate details through existing publications like the Transport Decarbonisation Plan and forthcoming documents such as the Levelling Up White Paper, Integrated Rail Plan, Union Connectivity Review, and EV charging infrastructure …
Read full response →
Department for Transport
2 Recommendation Second Report - Major transport infrast… Accepted in Part

The Government may need to amend the National Infrastructure Strategy to account for the evolution...

The Government may need to amend the National Infrastructure Strategy to account for the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic in the 10 months since the strategy’s publication. To assess whether and how the strategy requires revision, the Government must examine whether the major transport projects in the strategy will still … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government partially agrees, stating there is not enough evidence to amend the National Infrastructure Strategy (NIS) at this stage. However, they commit to individual projects assessing and addressing changes, working with the NIC to understand long-term effects, and ensuring business cases consider various demand …
Read full response →
Department for Transport
6 Recommendation Second Report - Major transport infrast… Accepted in Part

To facilitate transparent, honest and constructive public and political engagement with the economic and engineering...

To facilitate transparent, honest and constructive public and political engagement with the economic and engineering realities of delivering major infrastructure projects, the Government should establish floors and ceilings for project costs and timescales defining the range within which projects are scheduled for delivery rather than setting single specific targets, which … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation to use cost and schedule ranges for projects, stating this is already implemented for many ongoing projects. However, they reject establishing a formal trigger mechanism for parliamentary scrutiny, deeming it duplicative and complicating existing processes.
Read full response →
Department for Transport
7 Recommendation Second Report - Major transport infrast… Accepted in Part

Government agencies have repeatedly delivered major transport infrastructure projects that exceeded the specified cost and/or...

Government agencies have repeatedly delivered major transport infrastructure projects that exceeded the specified cost and/or delivery date. Senior management of those Government agencies were apparently unaccountable for such overruns. Senior management of Government agencies with ultimate responsibility for project delivery must be incentivised to avoid cost and/or time overruns. The … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government partially accepts, agreeing with the principle of incentivising senior management to avoid overruns and stating existing systems provide clear accountabilities and performance objectives. However, they reject implementing a formal duty for senior management to notify Select Committees of overruns, citing existing 6-monthly reporting …
Read full response →
Department for Transport
9 Recommendation Second Report - Major transport infrast… Accepted in Part

To ensure that the National Infrastructure Strategy supports (a) the “levelling up” agenda, (b) achieving...

To ensure that the National Infrastructure Strategy supports (a) the “levelling up” agenda, (b) achieving net zero emissions by 2050 and (c) economic recovery after the coronavirus pandemic, the Government must publish by 25 November 2021 a delivery plan setting out how its transport infrastructure commitments will be implemented to … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government partially agrees, declining to publish a single delivery plan by the specified date. Instead, they will disseminate details through existing publications like the Transport Decarbonisation Plan and forthcoming documents such as the Levelling Up White Paper, Integrated Rail Plan, Union Connectivity Review, and …
Read full response →
Department for Transport

Oral evidence sessions

3 sessions
Date Witnesses
7 Jul 2021 Nick Joyce · Department for Transport, Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP · Ministry of Defence View ↗
12 May 2021 Alistair Baldwin · Institute for Government, Elliot Shaw · Highways England, Graham Richards · Office of Rail and Road, Jon Loveday · NISTA, Mrs Ruth Humphrey · Siemens, Nick Smallwood · Infrastructure and Projects Authority, Simon Statham · Midlands Connect View ↗
17 Mar 2021 Bridget Rosewell CBE · National Infrastructure Commission, James Heath · National Infrastructure Commission, Jonathan Spruce · Institution for Civil Engineers, The Rt Hon. the Lord Hammond of Runnymede, Tony Meggs CB · Crossrail Ltd View ↗

Who gave evidence

14 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Alistair Baldwin · Author Institute for Government 1
Bridget Rosewell CBE · Commissioner National Infrastructure Commission 1
Elliot Shaw · Executive Director for Strategy and Planning Highways England 1
Graham Richards · Director of Planning Office of Rail and Road 1
James Heath National Infrastructure Commission 1
Jon Loveday · Director of Infrastructure, Enterprise and Growth NISTA 1
Jonathan Spruce · Fellow Institution for Civil Engineers 1
Mrs Ruth Humphrey · Head of Business Development and Strategy Siemens 1
Nick Joyce · Director General, Corporate Delivery Group Department for Transport 1
Nick Smallwood · CEO Infrastructure and Projects Authority 1
Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP · Secretary of State Ministry of Defence 1
Simon Statham · Chief Technical Officer Midlands Connect 1
The Rt Hon. the Lord Hammond of Runnymede 1
Tony Meggs CB · ex-Chairman Crossrail Ltd 1

Correspondence

2 letters
DateDirectionTitle
7 Sep 2021 Correspondence from Grant Shapps MP, Secretary of Transport, relating to Major …
30 Jun 2021 Correspondence from Elliot Shaw, Executive Director, Strategy and Planning, Hig…