Source · Select Committees · Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Eighth Report - Delivering nuclear power
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
HC 626
Published 31 July 2023
Recommendations
2
Deferred
Para 32
Spell out contribution of reactor life extensions to 24 GW nuclear target in Strategic Plan
Recommendation
The new Nuclear Strategic Plan, that we recommend, must spell out how the current reactor fleet, through life extensions, will contribute to the Government’s ambition of 24 GW from nuclear by 2050.
Government Response Summary
The government welcomed EDF's decision to extend two nuclear stations until March 2026, noting that lifetime extensions are decisions for the operator and regulator. It states it is not in a position to detail EDF's future plans for life extensions within the roadmap.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
4
Accepted
Para 42
Publish clear Nuclear Strategic Plan with detailed figures and interim targets for project pipeline
Recommendation
Setting a notably stretching target requires a credible pathway towards its delivery. The Government should publish a clear delivery plan, a Nuclear Strategic Plan, for its nuclear project pipeline, backed up by detailed figures of projected energy production from nuclear …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government committed to publishing a nuclear roadmap later in 2023, which will set out next steps for civil nuclear. It will also consult in autumn on alternative routes to market for new nuclear projects.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
6
Accepted
Para 47
Publish Simon Bowen's report on Great British Nuclear's purpose with Government response
Recommendation
The Government should publish the report and recommendations submitted by Simon Bowen, industrial adviser to Great British Nuclear, and his team on the purpose of Great British Nuclear, alongside the Government response to this report.
Government Response Summary
The government is minded to publish Simon Bowen’s advice, subject to commercial sensitivity, alongside the nuclear roadmap later in 2023.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
8
Accepted
Para 57
Publish secondary legislation clarifying Great British Nuclear's remit, funding model, and role in future projects.
Recommendation
In response to this Report, the Government should set out additional detail on how Government will intersect with Great British Nuclear, including details of Great British Nuclear’s exact remit and funding model, and the formal split of responsibilities with the …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states that GBN's roles and responsibilities are clarified in pending Energy Bill legislation. Further details on GBN's role will be set out in the nuclear roadmap, which is committed to be published later in the year.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
10
Acknowledged
Para 59
Advance SMR Final Investment Decisions before 2029 and provide detailed electricity supply timeline.
Recommendation
The Government should take steps to advance the ability for FIDs to be taken before 2029 and provide a detailed timeline of when it expects the winner or winners of GBN’s SMR technology selection process to begin commercially supplying electricity …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government reiterated GBN's role in delivering two nuclear Final Investment Decisions in the next Parliament and stated it is seeking to deliver the fastest SMR competition, but did not provide a detailed timeline for when SMRs are expected to supply electricity.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
12
Accepted
Provide sufficient resources to nuclear regulators to support new SMR and AMR operators.
Recommendation
The Government should provide sufficient resources to nuclear regulators, to support potential new operators of small and advanced modular reactor technologies to enter the UK energy market. (Paragraph 64) Delivering nuclear power 101
Government Response Summary
The government anticipates providing new funding from next year to support new nuclear. Additionally, a new process will be in place from December 2023 for vendors to access regulators prior to formal regulation.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
13
Accepted
Para 76
Provide clarity on achieving the 24 GW aim, including reactor mix and project timeline.
Recommendation
The Government should provide clarity on how it plans to achieve its 24 gigawatt aim, and the expected timeline for these. This should include details of: a) the target mix of reactor technologies, including the desired number of future gigawatt …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government clarified its 24GW ambition includes a pipeline of large-scale, SMR, and AMR technologies, aiming for SMR operational plants and Sizewell C generation by the mid-2030s, and committed to setting out further details in the Roadmap later this year.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
17
Accepted
Publish a detailed Nuclear Strategic Plan to expand nuclear fuel manufacturing capacity and secure supply.
Recommendation
By publishing a detailed Nuclear Strategic Plan, as we recommend, which includes the types and number of reactors to be built in the UK, the Government should provide a signal to the nuclear fuel industry to step up and increased …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government highlights existing efforts to secure a resilient nuclear fuel supply, including committing to diversify global fuel supply away from Russia and already investing over £35 million through the Nuclear Fuel Fund, with £10.5 million specifically for HALEU development.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
20
Accepted
Para 107
Answer key questions on SMR deployment, technology, sites, and financial models in the Nuclear Plan.
Recommendation
In developing a Nuclear Strategic Plan the Government should answer the questions of: • what deployment of SMRs it wants to see, if any; • what technologies and vendors it intends to deploy, and whether they will be from a …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government is addressing these questions by launching a Small Modular Reactor Technology Selection Process, providing co-funding, developing a new Nuclear National Policy Statement, and intending to consult later this year on future SMR siting strategy and financing models.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
24
Accepted
Para 123
Continue support for AMR R&D programme and make timely funding decisions to keep pace.
Recommendation
The Government should continue its support for the Advanced Modular Reactor Research, Development and Demonstration programme and ensure that it takes decisions on funding particular technologies and projects without delay, so that it keeps pace with competitors.
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and announced funding in July for Phase B of the Advanced Modular Reactor Research, Development and Demonstration programme, aiming for a demonstration by the early 2030s.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
30
Accepted
Integrate fusion research and development into the Government's long-term energy plan.
Recommendation
To maximise the benefits that we gain from investment in fusion requires a long-term approach to give confidence and stability to investors and international partners and so we recommend that fusion is a part of the Government’s long-term energy plan. …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government has accepted the recommendation, detailing over £700 million in investments for UKAEA, including £240 million for the STEP Programme to build a prototype fusion power plant by 2040, and an additional £650 million for R&D until 2027. These commitments show fusion is a long-term part of the energy strategy.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
33
Acknowledged
Para 164
Promote advantages of nuclear industry careers to school-leavers, graduates and career changers.
Recommendation
As part of a strategic approach to nuclear, the Government and the industry should set out steps deliberately to communicate to school-leavers, graduates and to those changing careers, the particular advantages of choosing to work in the nuclear industry.
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the need for skills in the nuclear industry and mentions its work with the Nuclear Skills Strategy Group and the recently launched Nuclear Skills Taskforce to identify gaps and ensure the right training, but does not detail specific communication steps to attract new recruits.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
37
Deferred
Apply consistent pay flexibilities across public sector research bodies, maintaining financial discipline through budgets.
Recommendation
In line with Sir Paul Nurse’s recommendations for greater flexibility on pay with conditions for Public Sector Research Establishments, we recommend that a consistent set of pay flexibilities should be applied to public bodies in the sector with financial discipline …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government stated that the recommendation regarding pay flexibilities was beyond the remit of the responding skills team, providing no substantive response.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
40
Accepted
Para 218
Demonstrate value for money to taxpayers for gigawatt nuclear, including full construction risk estimates.
Recommendation
The Government should show how this offers value for money to taxpayers and should be open to other alternative partnerships between the public and private sectors as practised in other countries (including those set out in Table 2). The choice …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government referred to its Impact Assessment for the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Act 2022, which estimates RAB could save £30bn, and its published analysis from November 2022 that concludes Sizewell C is likely to offer value for money.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
41
Rejected
Para 219
Publish detailed financial figures on construction risk and cost to taxpayers for new gigawatt nuclear.
Recommendation
So far, the Government has not published financial figures which allow the cost of this risk transfer to be known. The Government must publish figures, before signing contracts for new gigawatt-scale nuclear, which allow a proper assessment of value for …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government stated that while capital costs are under scrutiny, publishing sensitive financial information, including construction risk costs, prior to a final investment decision (FID) could undermine negotiations. It reaffirmed its commitment to publish a value for money assessment before taking an FID for Sizewell C, having already published one at the designation stage.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
42
Acknowledged
Disclose best estimate of public risk value and management plan for gigawatt nuclear projects.
Recommendation
It may be the case that the size of capital outlay means that private investors will not repeat a CfD contract for new nuclear, whatever the price. But the lack of alternative choices should not mean that any terms will …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government stated that it will ensure consumer and taxpayer interests are protected as a shareholder in Sizewell C, committing to implement multiple mechanisms to manage project costs and schedules and ensure unacceptable costs are not borne by consumers before a final investment decision.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
43
Deferred
Para 221
Publish Sizewell C RAB model savings calculations and Heads of Terms for funding structure clarity.
Recommendation
The Government should publish details of how the estimated savings from using the RAB model for funding Sizewell C were calculated, and provide clarity for the funding structure, by publishing the Heads of Terms for the agreed RAB funding model …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government referred to an Impact Assessment for illustrative RAB model savings for a generic plant but stated that specific Sizewell C cost details and Heads of Terms are commercially sensitive and cannot be disclosed at this time.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
45
Deferred
Para 226
Communicate a clear financial model for initial SMR deployment, as CfD is unsuitable.
Recommendation
If a single supplier of SMRs were to be available, either through Government choice or following the Generic Design Assessment process, the CfD auction model will not be suitable. As part of a clear and specific strategy for SMRs, the …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government stated that Great British Nuclear's technology selection process is not limited to a single supplier and that the Regulated Asset Base (RAB) model is a promising option for SMRs. A consultation on "alternative routes to market," including the appropriate business model for SMRs, was planned for Autumn 2023.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
47
Accepted
Conduct and publish consultation results quickly, reviewing nuclear energy's Green Financing access
Recommendation
The Government should conduct and publish the results of its consultation quickly, and during this time review nuclear energy’s access to the Green Financing Framework with a view to ensuring consistency and addressing the contradiction between the two. (Paragraph 235) …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government expects to consult on the UK Green Taxonomy in Autumn 2023, which will include nuclear energy, to encourage private investment. It commits to transparently publishing any future changes to the Green Financing Framework.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
50
Accepted
Para 250
Reduce GDA application timelines through international collaboration and recognise partner country safety approvals
Recommendation
The Government should consider how it could reduce the GDA application timelines and the required resources through international collaborations between regulators, and should provide access to pre-engagement for new nuclear developers prior to Delivering nuclear power 107 entering the GDA. …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government committed in July 2023 to consult in autumn on alternative routes to market for new nuclear projects. It accepts the recommendation to examine pre-engagement for new nuclear developers and states that the department and regulators are currently undertaking projects to explore this.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
51
Accepted
Para 251
Ensure nuclear regulators possess sufficient resources to process increasing applications promptly
Recommendation
The Government should ensure as part of a specific and detailed nuclear strategy that the ONR, the Environment Agency and Natural Resources Wales have the necessary resources to process applications from the growing range and number of applicants in a …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government stated that a set of recommendations has been produced and discussions are underway to put funding in place from next year to ensure the regulators have the necessary resources.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
54
Accepted
Para 258
Streamline planning and environmental requirements, running DCOs and GDA in parallel where possible
Recommendation
The Government should work with regulators, devolved administrations, local authorities, industry leaders, and others to streamline planning and environmental requirements wherever possible. The Office for Nuclear Regulation should look for opportunities to run the Development Consent Orders and the GDA …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The ONR and EA are reviewing GDA processes and will report in April 2024 on options for increased flexibility. The government will also work closely with regulators to identify potential streamlining or duplication removal in consenting and licensing, including harmonising international regulation.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
56
Accepted
Progress new nuclear NPS EN-7 consultation, meet deadline, and identify all reactor sites
Recommendation
The Government should progress the consultation on the new NPS EN-7 for nuclear power and should meet its previously stated deadline of early 2025, and ideally publish the new NPS earlier than the deadline. Any update should identify where reactors …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government intends to publish an initial consultation on the new nuclear NPS before the end of 2023, addressing SMRs and advanced nuclear technologies. It aims to consult on the draft NPS in 2024 and designate the new NPS in 2025, meeting the previously stated deadline.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
59
Acknowledged
Para 282
Establish a long-term plan to expand NDA's international decommissioning work and monitor UK service.
Recommendation
The NDA should establish, with the involvement of government, a long-term plan to expand this international work while monitoring a thorough and dependable service within the UK.
Government Response Summary
The government states the NDA already engages internationally and will continue to work with the NDA to consider how its international capabilities might be enhanced. The NDA will also continue to explore opportunities for international collaboration and best practice sharing.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
63
Accepted
Accelerate identifying a safe GDF site with community confidence, without halting new nuclear development.
Recommendation
The first waste is not expected to be placed into a Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) until the 2050s and until then, there is sufficient interim storage for both current and predicted future nuclear waste. The Government should continue work to …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepted both parts of the recommendation, detailing the ongoing GDF siting process which aims to select sites for detailed characterisation by 2026-27. It also explicitly agreed that new nuclear power plants should not be halted until a GDF is established, citing existing safe waste management practices.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details →
Conclusions (38)
1
Conclusion
Deferred
Para 31
We conclude that it is reasonable for EDF to seek life extensions to extend their contribution to the grid if, and only if, the Office for Nuclear Regulation’s judgement is that they can be safely operational as is currently the case.
Government Response Summary
The government welcomed EDF's decision to extend Heysham 1 and Hartlepool until March 2026 but stated that future lifetime extensions are decisions for the operator and the independent nuclear regulator based on safety and commercial considerations.
3
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 41
Gigawatt-scale nuclear power stations use a known and well understood technology that can deliver dependable low carbon baseload electricity to the grid. Nuclear power is therefore an important option and could be used to produce a domestic supply of baseload power to the UK as part of the low carbon …
Government Response Summary
The government committed to publishing a nuclear roadmap later in 2023 to detail next steps for civil nuclear and will consult in autumn on alternative routes to market for new nuclear projects.
5
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 46
In his previous role as industry advisor to Great British Nuclear, Simon Bowen produced a report proposing what function and form Great British Nuclear should take. This report was delivered to the Government in September 2022.
Government Response Summary
The government stated it is minded to publish Simon Bowen's advice, subject to commercial sensitivity considerations, alongside the nuclear roadmap later in the year.
7
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 56
The 2050 target for nuclear of 24 GW needs a plan to achieve it, which must include clarity on the bodies and institutions that will deliver it. After asking the Department to provide more clarity on what legislation will be required to ensure that Great British Nuclear can operate as …
Government Response Summary
The government stated that legislation in the Energy Bill clarifies GBN's roles and responsibilities and committed to providing further detail on GBN's role in the Nuclear Roadmap to be published later this year.
9
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 58
In its July 2023 announcement on Great British Nuclear, the Government said that it would use the small modular reactor technology selection process (SMR TSP) to identify those reactor companies best able to reach a project Final Investment Decision (FID) by the end of 2029. The FID would include funding …
Government Response Summary
The government clarified that the Small Modular Reactor Technology Selection Process anticipates including all relevant planning and regulatory approvals required to reach a Final Investment Decision by 2029.
11
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 63
Gigawatt-scale nuclear power plants require UK experience—of the supply chain, regulatory processes and the wider energy sector—to deliver projects efficiently. However, the UK may benefit in the future from multiple operators of small and advanced, nuclear power technologies as they have the potential to provide market competition, collaboration opportunities and …
Government Response Summary
The government committed to introducing new funding from next year to support new nuclear and implementing a new process from December 2023 for vendors to access regulators on a chargeable basis before formal regulation.
14
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 77
An essential requirement will be to resolve of the questions of whether a standardised fleet of nuclear power plants, using serial versions of the same reactor technology, has the potential to benefit the UK as new knowledge and resources can be transferred from one project to the next, reducing the …
Government Response Summary
The government stated it is continuing to consider how all nuclear technologies could contribute to UK energy security and climate change targets.
15
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 78
The Government, through Great British Nuclear, must choose between the potential cost benefits of a standardised nuclear fleet of gigawatt reactors and the energy security and resilience that a diversity of reactor designs provides.
Government Response Summary
The government is continuing to consider how all technologies could contribute to UK energy security and meeting climate change targets, without making a specific choice between standardised or diverse reactor designs.
16
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 89
The UK is an international market leader in the manufacture of nuclear fuels and is uniquely positioned with the capability of delivering the entire nuclear fuel cycle. The nuclear fuel sector in the UK has the potential to increase enrichment capacity, which can provide security for domestic nuclear fuel supply …
Government Response Summary
The government highlighted commitments under the Sapporo Agreement and US-UK Atlantic Declaration to diversify fuel supply away from Russia, and detailed over £35 million invested via the Nuclear Fuel Fund, including £10.5 million for a HALEU supply chain.
18
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 105
The Government is at a cross-roads in its policy on small modular reactors (SMRs). So far it has funded a consortium led by Rolls-Royce with over £210 million of research and development funds to develop a concept SMR design, and now, to further develop the design to the extent that …
Government Response Summary
The government committed to co-funding selected SMR technologies through GBN's Technology Selection Process by 2029, developing a new nuclear National Policy Statement beyond 2025, and consulting on siting strategy and SMR funding models in Autumn 2023.
19
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 106
It is not uncommon, in the face of an unclear strategy or unresolved internal arguments about financing, for governments to defer decisions rather than take them. But this would be the wrong course. The UK risks losing the advantage of 102 Delivering nuclear power the public investment that has already …
Government Response Summary
The government is actively working on several fronts to advance SMRs, including launching a Technology Selection Process, providing co-funding, developing a new nuclear National Policy Statement, and intending to consult later this year on future siting strategy and SMR financing models.
21
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 120
From the commissioning of Calder Hall in the 1950s, the UK has always had a strong capability in nuclear research and development. At a time where there is a global commitment to reduce carbon emissions and to reduce dependence on fossil fuels for reasons of energy security, the UK’s capability …
Government Response Summary
The government agreed with the committee's findings and committed to accelerating the Advanced Modular Reactor RDD programme, having announced funding for Phase B aiming for a demonstration by the early 2030s.
22
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 121
Whilst investment by Government in early stage and demonstrator reactors will drive forward innovation for advanced modular reactors (AMRs), bringing them closer to commercialisation, what is also important is the UK having a regulatory environment and incentives for private investment. This has been demonstrated to work in the UK’s fusion …
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's findings and announced funding in July for USNC UK and NNL-JAEA for Phase B of the Advanced Modular Reactor Research, Development and Demonstration programme, aiming for an AMR demonstration by the early 2030s.
23
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 122
AMRs may offer new advantages in terms of cost and the potential for co-generation. But if they are to advance the research and development needs to move from the desk and the lab towards demonstrators, and this will require the Government to make decisions as to which technologies to fund.
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's findings and announced funding in July for USNC UK and NNL-JAEA for Phase B of the Advanced Modular Reactor Research, Development and Demonstration programme, aiming for an AMR demonstration by the early 2030s.
25
Conclusion
Accepted
The UK is a leading global player in uranium enrichment and nuclear fuel fabrication and has the potential to replace Russia’s contribution to the global supply chain of advanced fuels. We welcome the launch and allocation of funding from the Nuclear Fuel Fund to support the development of the capabilities …
Government Response Summary
The government reinforced its commitment to a secure nuclear fuel supply, outlining existing capabilities and its strategy to diversify global supply away from Russia through international agreements. It specified over £35 million has already been invested through the Nuclear Fuel Fund, including £10.5 million for high-assay low enriched uranium (HALEU) development.
26
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 142
The work of the UK Atomic Energy Authority has resulted in a thriving research and development fusion cluster at the Culham Science Centre in Oxfordshire. As well as operating the world’s leading torus and spherical fusion reactors, the Culham facility benefits from being part of a consortium of 30 fusion …
Government Response Summary
The government committed significant investment to UKAEA's research programs, including over £700 million from 2021/22 to 2024/25, £240m for the STEP Programme aiming for a fusion plant by 2040, and an additional £650 million for new R&D programmes until 2027.
27
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 143
Since 2010, the UK public investment into fusion research and development has totalled around £970 million. All such investment of taxpayer funds has alternative uses, whether in science, energy, or other fields. Sceptics of fusion argue, in the much-repeated phrase, that the benefits of fusion are always 20 years away—with …
Government Response Summary
The government responds to the committee's observations about fusion investment by detailing significant past and future financial commitments to UKAEA's fusion programmes, including the STEP Programme and additional R&D funding, reaffirming its support despite the noted long-term uncertainties.
28
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 144
However, in recent months breakthroughs have been made in fusion research, including doubling of the record for power generated in a tokamak; there is a growing number of private fusion companies clustered in Culham and the UK is a leading nation in the ITER project.
Government Response Summary
The government responds to the committee's positive observations about fusion breakthroughs and the UK's leading role by detailing substantial past and future financial investments in UKAEA's fusion programmes, demonstrating continued commitment.
29
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 145
We believe that it is not the time to abandon our long-standing commitment to fusion, just at the point when it is giving cause for optimism; when the zero- carbon imperative is strong; when we have an internationally admired and well- run organisation in the UK Atomic Energy Authority, and …
Government Response Summary
The government responds to the committee's belief that commitment to fusion should not be abandoned by detailing significant past and future financial investments in UKAEA's fusion programmes, thereby indicating its continued long-standing commitment.
31
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 162
It is not surprising that the nuclear sector has not been the industry of choice for many STEM specialists embarking on a career. At a time when no new nuclear plants had been approved for decades, this was a sector thought by some not to be one with a bright …
Government Response Summary
The government committed to ensuring the nuclear industry has the necessary skills, working with the Nuclear Skills Strategy Group and having recently launched a Nuclear Skills Taskforce to accelerate efforts to identify and address skills gaps.
32
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 163
However, if the Government and the nuclear industry credibly adopt a stable, long term plan of growing the nuclear sector, there are very significant attractions to recruitment: new build and new technologies involve innovation and technical 104 Delivering nuclear power advances; the timescales of nuclear commitments offers the prospect of …
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the importance of ensuring the nuclear industry has required skills and highlights its commitment to a proposed new nuclear programme. It mentions ongoing work with the Nuclear Skills Strategy Group and the recently launched Nuclear Skills Taskforce to identify skills gaps and develop training.
34
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 170
It is highly desirable that, in expanding employment in the sector, opportunities should continue to be broadened to people from sectors other than nuclear. Apart from the wider pool of talent available, it is important there should be flows into and out of the nuclear industry from other industries. The …
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges its commitment to ensuring the nuclear industry has the required skills and works with the Nuclear Skills Strategy Group and the Nuclear Skills Taskforce to address skills gaps, but does not specifically detail how it will broaden opportunities for people from other sectors.
35
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 171
As a matter of strategic planning, the Government and the sector should, at a time of expansion, deliberately increase the permeability of the sector to other commercial, engineering and scientific sectors.
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges its commitment to ensuring the nuclear industry has the required skills and works with the Nuclear Skills Strategy Group and Nuclear Skills Taskforce to identify gaps, but does not specify actions to increase the sector's permeability to other commercial, engineering, and scientific sectors.
36
Conclusion
Not Addressed
Para 177
We were impressed by the obviously effective working relationship between the National College for Nuclear and the Hinkley Point C Project. In this case, the training provided, and the apprenticeships offered, are clearly tied to a specific employer and site. We were concerned that there was a lack of clarity …
Government Response Summary
The government reiterates its commitment to ensuring the nuclear industry has the required skills and works with the Nuclear Skills Strategy Group and the Nuclear Skills Taskforce to identify skills gaps, but does not address the specific recommendation to develop a clear protocol for funding curriculum development for employer-specific courses.
38
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 216
Gigawatt-scale nuclear projects cost tens of billions of pounds to plan and construct before a single unit of electricity is generated. Their long period of construction, complexity, and subordination to potentially variable regulatory standards have been associated with large cost-over runs and delays. For all of these reasons, and more, …
Government Response Summary
The government reported that the long-stop date for cancellation of the Hinkley Point C contract was extended by three years, from November 2033 to November 2036, to account for unexpected events like the Covid-19 pandemic.
39
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 217
Given the demonstrated unwillingness of private investors to take on all of the construction risk of gigawatt scale nuclear plants through the CfD model, it is inevitable that a public-private risk sharing model should be contemplated if new gigawatt-scale plants are to be constructed. The Regulated Asset Base (RAB) model— …
Government Response Summary
The government defended the Regulated Asset Base (RAB) model by highlighting statutory requirements for value for money assessments and consumer interest considerations. It committed to publishing a full value for money assessment for any RAB project at its final investment decision, and plans a programmatic approach through Great British Nuclear to reduce costs.
44
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 225
This is an important moment for the future of small modular reactors (SMRs) as we set out in Chapter 3. Following the £500 million Government and investor funded development of an SMR concept through to the beginning stages of regulatory approval. Clarity is needed on the Government’s plans to deploy …
Government Response Summary
The government explained the differences between the CfD and RAB financing models, highlighting the RAB model as an established option for new nuclear projects, including SMRs, which aims to provide investor certainty. However, it did not commit to a specific financing model for SMR deployment.
46
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 234
We welcome the proposed inclusion of nuclear energy generation in the UK Green Taxonomy as it reflects the low-carbon contribution of nuclear power and may make new building projects more attractive to private investors as with other low-carbon energy generators.
Government Response Summary
The government expects to consult on the UK Green Taxonomy in Autumn 2023 and has committed to including nuclear energy in the taxonomy, subject to this consultation, to encourage private investment.
48
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 248
The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) Generic Design Assessment’s (GDA) goal- based approach is well regarded internationally and is intended to be adaptable for any new technology. We welcome the work that the ONR has done to modify the GDA to allow more flexibility for new reactor designs that seek …
Government Response Summary
The government accepted the recommendation to examine pre-engagement for new nuclear developers and confirmed that the department and regulators are currently undertaking projects to assess its feasibility and best processes.
49
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 249
Some witnesses are concerned that the GDA has capacity constraints and is a lengthy and expensive process given that there are no site-specific guarantees afterwards. Whilst acknowledging the need for UK sovereignty over regulations, witnesses pointed out the considerable overlap of the technical approval process for new reactors between established …
Government Response Summary
The government committed in July 2023 to consult in autumn on alternative routes to market for new nuclear projects. It states it continues to seek ways to streamline the GDA process and is undertaking projects to examine the feasibility and best processes for pre-engagement for new nuclear developers.
52
Conclusion
Deferred
Para 252
Whilst the ONR has recently adapted the GDA to be more suitable for small modular reactor (SMR) technologies, to date no SMR design has completed the entire three step process. The ONR should reflect, both during and after the first SMR has completed the GDA, on the lessons to be …
Government Response Summary
The government deflected the recommendation, stating that as an independent organisation, it is for the ONR and other regulators to comment on their processes for lessons learned, and the government should not comment.
53
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 257
Although the reputation and integrity of UK nuclear regulation must be maintained, there are opportunities to improve the efficiencies of nuclear regulation by running processes such as the Generic Design Assessment (GDA), and site licencing, in parallel.
Government Response Summary
The government stated that the ONR and Environment Agency are reviewing GDA processes and will report in April 2024, considering options for increased flexibility. The government will also work closely with regulators to identify potential streamlining or duplication removal in consenting and licensing, and improve pre-application services.
55
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 266
Given that the Minister envisaged a three-year timeline to develop, consult upon, and designate a new nuclear National Policy Statement (NPS), and that as of 18 July 2023 the consultation stage had not even started, we are concerned that there may be a creeping delay in updating the NPS for …
Government Response Summary
The government committed to publishing a consultation on potential sites for new nuclear developments, including SMRs, before the end of 2023. It aims to consult on the draft National Policy Statement in 2024 and designate the new NPS in 2025.
57
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 280
Decades of mismanagement of nuclear decommissioning in the UK—from inadequate provision for decommissioning costs, to record keeping so negligent as to have left ponds of radioactive waste whose content in unknown—has made the responsibilities of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) some of the most challenging, complex and consequential of any …
Government Response Summary
The government stated that the NDA already maintains strong relationships and regular interactions with the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Treasury, and Ministry of Defence, including engagement on strategy and investment decisions.
58
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 281
The experience and expertise which the NDA has in civil nuclear decommissioning is more than any other country in the world, as a result of the head start the UK has had in being the world’s first civil nuclear nation. As countries who were later in constructing civil nuclear power …
Government Response Summary
The government states the NDA already engages internationally, including supporting Japan, and will continue to explore opportunities and share best practices through existing agreements. The government will also continue to work with NDA to consider enhancing their capabilities.
60
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 283
Most of the nuclear waste that the UK must safely handle and dispose of has already been produced by previous nuclear installations. The incremental waste generated by new nuclear power plants is not likely to be a material factor in decisions on approving new gigawatt-scale plants. We note, however, evidence …
Government Response Summary
The government agrees new plants should be designed with decommissioning in mind and explains that existing legislation (Energy Act 2008) already requires operators to have Funded Decommissioning Programmes approved, with expert advice from the NDA and NWS.
61
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 284
It is imperative that a clear understanding of the waste consequences of new nuclear technologies, how it will be dealt with and at what cost, should be part of the decision- making on approving the case of these technologies.
Government Response Summary
The government agrees that new nuclear plants should be designed with decommissioning and waste management in mind. It states that existing legislation, such as the Energy Act 2008, already requires operators to have an approved Funded Decommissioning Programme (FDP) to manage these costs and plans.
62
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 296
Since 2006, Government policy has been to establish a Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) for the long-term storage of nuclear waste. Despite this, Nuclear Waste Services, which is the body responsible for establishing a GDF, is not at the point of having found a community willing to host a GDF or …
Government Response Summary
The government outlines specific timelines for the Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) process, aiming to select sites for characterisation by 2026–27, conduct deep boreholes around 2029–30, begin construction in the 2040s, and have the GDF operational by the 2050s.