Source · Select Committees · Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Recommendation 24
24
Acknowledged
Paragraph: 149
Throughout the pandemic, the UK has relied on its own bespoke system of science advice...
Recommendation
Throughout the pandemic, the UK has relied on its own bespoke system of science advice and guidance on non-pharmaceutical interventions, while at the same time global-level guidance has been issued regularly by the World Health Organisation (WHO). There have also been numerous opportunities to learn from the approaches undertaken by nations around the world. The UK’s policies on areas such as testing and tracing, the two-metre rule and the use of face coverings suggest that the Government’s approach has been to carve its own path between SAGE and WHO advice. We have heard that a “precautionary” approach was taken to social distancing in the UK—based on SAGE guidance—above the World Health Organisation’s recommendation of “at least 1 metre”. However, on face coverings a precautionary approach was not employed, and SAGE’s recommendations were not taken up until two months after they were made. In general, more lessons could have been applied from the experiences of other countries, particularly those which have dealt with previous coronavirus outbreaks (e.g. SARS and MERS). The Government should commit to review—before the end of 2021—the relationship between SAGE and expert advisory structures in other countries and the World Health Organisation, to understand where knowledge sharing may be improved during future emergencies.
Government response summary AI-generated
The government states it keeps non-pharmaceutical interventions under constant review and engages in regular dialogue with other countries, considering international approaches in its policy decisions. However, it does not commit to a specific review of the relationship between SAGE, international advisory structures, and the WHO to improve knowledge sharing, nor to the requested deadline.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Paragraph Reference:
149
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government · verbatim extract
Acknowledged
GCSA and CMO have, since the start of the pandemic, engaged with international counterparts on a regular basis in order to share information during what has been a rapidly evolving situation. The UK is currently on the Executive Board of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Government regularly engages with the WHO and shares information. SAGE participants have also engaged with international counterparts to share and discuss the latest understanding of the pandemic. The SAGE model is well-regarded internationally and GO-Science engages with other nations who are interested in the UK approach to emergency science advice. GO-Science continuously explores ways to feed into international lessons learnt fora. For example, it recently contributed to the Government’s response to the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response following a request from WHO Member States in July 2020 to look at the C-19 pandemic and how the WHO responded. GO-Science also has links to various international organisations with an interest in science for emergencies, such as the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development and the International Network for Government Science Advice. It will consider the Committee’s recommendation as it takes this work forward.
Read the full response on Parliament ↗