Select Committee · Science, Innovation and Technology Committee

Innovation, growth and the regions

Status: Open Opened: 6 Dec 2024 30 recommendations 13 conclusions 1 report

The Science, Innovation and Technology Select Committee is launching an inquiry into “Innovation, growth and the regions” to assess the role of the UK’s innovation ecosystem in achieving the Government’s mission to kickstart economic growth across the country. The inquiry will consider the role of structural factors—such as the tax system, regulatory requirements, and standards—in …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
3rd Report - Flying Blind: Innovation, Growth and the Regio… HC 538 13 Mar 2026 43 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

6 items
7 Conclusion 3rd Report - Flying Blind: Innovation, … Acknowledged

While the most cutting-edge science may be best carried out in established centres of excellence,...

While the most cutting-edge science may be best carried out in established centres of excellence, as Lord Vallance put it, there are centres of excellence across the country, in Cardiff, Durham, Edinburgh, Leeds, Manchester, Milton Keynes and Newcastle – amongst others. Traditional innovation hubs like London, Oxford and Cambridge are …

Government response. The government partially agrees with the principle of tracking regional R&D impact, stating it is strengthening transparency by publishing regional data and an Innovation Clusters Map with future annual updates, and will continue to refine data over time.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
19 Recommendation 3rd Report - Flying Blind: Innovation, … Acknowledged

The Government should consider making funding to build the capacity of technology transfer offices contingent...

The Government should consider making funding to build the capacity of technology transfer offices contingent on their ability to deliver significant volume of throughput and provide evidence of success in building capacity and developing skills in their local economies. (Recommendation,Paragraph 58)

Government response. The government agrees with the overall intent of the recommendation and highlights initiatives to improve access to finance for deep tech companies and strengthen specialist investor capability through the British Business Bank and venture capital fellowships, but does not commit …
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
23 Recommendation 3rd Report - Flying Blind: Innovation, … Acknowledged

The Government should expand the Proof of Concept Fund and ensure it meets the needs...

The Government should expand the Proof of Concept Fund and ensure it meets the needs of existing or emerging clusters of innovation. It should also increase the size of available awards to £1 million. (Recommendation, Paragraph 78)

Government response. The government partially agrees with the objective but does not commit to expanding the Proof of Concept Fund or increasing award sizes. Instead, it highlights the work of the Regulatory Innovation Office (RIO) in addressing regulatory barriers and refers to …
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
38 Conclusion 3rd Report - Flying Blind: Innovation, … Acknowledged

The establishment of the Regulatory Innovation Office is a welcome recognition of the need to...

The establishment of the Regulatory Innovation Office is a welcome recognition of the need to tackle regulatory barriers to innovation, particularly at the cutting edge. We believe that it can play a significant role in ensuring that innovation benefits the whole of the UK, beyond the and we will be …

Government response. The government partially agrees, confirming the Regulatory Innovation Office's focused role in identifying and addressing regulatory barriers for priority technologies and its annual reporting of progress and impact, while noting broader issues are handled by wider government activity.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
40 Conclusion 3rd Report - Flying Blind: Innovation, … Acknowledged

Local leaders, including but not only mayoral authorities, are pivotal to regional innovation ecosystems and...

Local leaders, including but not only mayoral authorities, are pivotal to regional innovation ecosystems and regional growth. Their proximity to stakeholders, understanding of their areas, and ability to convene cross- sector partnerships position them uniquely to drive growth. Devolved national, regional and local authorities could play a greater role in …

Government response. The government partially agrees with the observation, highlighting ongoing initiatives like the English Devolution White Paper and Investment Zones to support local leaders in unlocking regional innovation potential. It references DSIT and UKRI reforms to build partnerships and increase regional …
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
41 Conclusion 3rd Report - Flying Blind: Innovation, … Acknowledged

The Local Innovation Partnerships Fund’s ambition to give regions more control over innovation policy is...

The Local Innovation Partnerships Fund’s ambition to give regions more control over innovation policy is welcome, but it falls short on scale, with just £500 million over five years, or around 0.5% of the science budget. (Conclusion, Paragraph 130) 49

Government response. The government acknowledges the Local Innovation Partnerships Fund as a starting point and the UK's largest cluster-focused regional programme, stating it will monitor outcomes and build upon it if successful, but does not commit to increasing its scale.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Oral evidence sessions

1 session
Date Witnesses
6 May 2025 Kristen McLeod · British Business Bank, Louis Taylor · British Business Bank, Mathias Rauch · Fraunhofer UK, Neil Lee · London School of Economics (LSE) View ↗