Select Committee · Science and Technology Committee (Commons)

Governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

Status: Closed Opened: 20 Oct 2022 Closed: 28 May 2024 24 recommendations 60 conclusions 2 reports
Inquiry scopeThe use of artificial intelligence (AI) has increased significantly in recent years. It offers a range of potential benefits such as quicker analysis of large datasets allowing more accurate information, forecasts and predictions, and more personalised public services. However, there are a number of concerns, such as the possibility of biased algorithms, a lack of transparency and unexplained decision-making. The Government is expected to publish a white paper on AI governance later this year to address these issues. The Committee will examine the effectiveness of AI governance and the Government’s proposals.

Reports

2 reports

Recommendations & Conclusions

1 item

How to read the colours. These are AI-assisted assessments of the position taken in the published government response. They are not official government labels and do not show whether promised action was delivered.

Definitions for the six response statuses
Accepted
Accepts the item, commits to concrete action, or says existing work already addresses it.
Accepted in Part
Accepts only part of the item or offers narrower action.
Acknowledged
Recognises the issue without making a specific commitment.
Deferred
Leaves action to a future process or redirects responsibility elsewhere.
Not Addressed
Does not engage with the substance of the item.
Rejected
Explicitly declines or disagrees with the item.
Response status not verified
Our records do not establish the response status. A missing link or passed expected date does not show that no response was published.
Response attribution not verified
A response has not been verified against this item. This is a limitation of our records, not a finding about the government.

Read the published response text for the full context.

32 Recommendation Third Report - Governance of artificial intelligence (AI) Not Addressed

Require robust, independent testing and performance analysis for AI models prior to deployment.

Recommendation · source text

AI can entrench and accelerate existing biases. The current Government, future administrations and sectoral regulators should require deployers of AI models and tools to submit them to robust, independent testing and performance analysis prior to deployment. (Paragraph 140) 56 Governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

Link to this item · Read item and full response

Government response AI summary
The government's response is boilerplate text and does not address the recommendation to require robust, independent testing of AI models for bias prior to deployment.
Read full response →
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Oral evidence sessions

9 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
13 Dec 2023
Work for the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology
Rt Hon Michelle Donelan · Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Sarah Munby · Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
View ↗
8 Nov 2023
Governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
Emran Mian · Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Matt Clifford · AI Safety Summit
View ↗
25 Oct 2023
Governance of AI
Dame Melanie Dawes · Ofcom, Jessica Rusu · Financial Conduct Authority, John Edwards · Information Commissioner's Office, Kate Jones · Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum, Will Hayter · Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
View ↗
24 May 2023
Governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
Dr Marion Oswald · The Alan Turing Institute and Northumbria University, Dr Tony Mansfield · National Physical Laboratory, Lindsey Chiswick · Metropolitan Police, Michael Birtwistle · Ada Lovelace Institute
View ↗
10 May 2023
Governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
Coran Darling · DLA Piper, Dr Hayleigh Bosher · Brunel University, Jamie Njoku-Goodwin · UK Music, Paul Fleming · Equity
View ↗
29 Mar 2023
Oral evidence session
Daisy Christodoulou · No More Marking, Dr Matthew Glanville · The International Baccalaureate, Joel Kenyon · Dormers Wells High School, Southall, London, Professor Rose Luckin · University College London
View ↗
8 Mar 2023
Oral evidence session
Professor Andrew Hopkins · Exscientia, Professor Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes · University College London, Professor Mihaela van der Schaar · Cambridge Centre for AI in Medicine, Cambridge University
View ↗
22 Feb 2023
Oral evidence session
Adrian Joseph · BT Group, Hugh Milward · Microsoft, Jen Gennai · Google, Professor Dame Wendy Hall · University of Southampton, Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt · Jesus College, University of Oxford
View ↗
25 Jan 2023
Panel One; Panel Two
Dr Manish Patel · Jiva.ai, Michael Cohen · University of Oxford, Mrs Katherine Holden · techUK, Professor Michael Osborne · University of Oxford and Mind Foundry
View ↗

Who gave evidence

33 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Adrian Joseph · Chief Data and AI Officer BT Group 1
Coran Darling · Associate, Intellectual Property and Technology DLA Piper 1
Daisy Christodoulou · Director of Education No More Marking 1
Dame Melanie Dawes · Chief Executive Ofcom 1
Dr Hayleigh Bosher · Senior Lecturer in Intellectual Property Law Brunel University 1
Dr Manish Patel · CEO Jiva.ai 1
Dr Marion Oswald · Senior Research Associate for Safe and Ethical AI and Associate Professor in Law The Alan Turing Institute and Northumbria University 1
Dr Matthew Glanville · Head of Assessment Principles and Practice The International Baccalaureate 1
Dr Tony Mansfield · Principal Research Scientist National Physical Laboratory 1
Emran Mian · Director General, Regeneration Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities 1
Hugh Milward · UK Vice President of Corporate Affairs Microsoft 1
Jamie Njoku-Goodwin · Chief Executive UK Music 1
Jen Gennai · Director, Responsible Innovation Google 1
Jessica Rusu · Chief Data, Information and Intelligence Officer Financial Conduct Authority 1
Joel Kenyon · Science Teacher and Community Cohesion Lead Dormers Wells High School, Southall, London 1
John Edwards · Information Commissioner Information Commissioner's Office 1
Kate Jones · Chief Executive Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum 1
Lindsey Chiswick · Director of Intelligence Metropolitan Police 1
Matt Clifford · Prime Minister’s representative AI Safety Summit 1
Michael Birtwistle · Associate Director Ada Lovelace Institute 1
Michael Cohen · DPhil candidate in Engineering Science University of Oxford 1
Mrs Katherine Holden · Head of Data Analytics, AI and Digital Identity techUK 1
Paul Fleming · General Secretary Equity 1
Professor Andrew Hopkins · Chief Executive Exscientia 1
Professor Dame Wendy Hall · Regius Professor of Computer Science University of Southampton 1
Professor Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes · Professor of Biomedical Computing University College London 1
Professor Michael Osborne · Professor of Machine Learning and co-founder University of Oxford and Mind Foundry 1
Professor Mihaela van der Schaar · John Humphrey Plummer Professor of Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence and Medicine, and Director Cambridge Centre for AI in Medicine, Cambridge University 1
Professor Rose Luckin · Professor of Learner Centred Design University College London 1
Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt · Professorial Research Fellow in Computer Science and Principal Jesus College, University of Oxford 1
Rt Hon Michelle Donelan · Secretary of State Department for Science, Innovation and Technology 1
Sarah Munby · Permanent Secretary Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 1
Will Hayter · Senior Director, Digital Markets Unit Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) 1

Correspondence

2 letters

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.