Select Committee · Home Affairs Committee

Drugs

Status: Closed Opened: 10 Feb 2022 Closed: 1 Feb 2024 38 recommendations 33 conclusions 1 report

The focus of the inquiry is on illegal drug use and its effects on society and the economy. The inquiry considers the UK’s legislative framework on drugs and UK drug policy. The framework refers to, for example: the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971; the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016; and, where relevant, any subordinate legislation made …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Third Report - Drugs HC 198 31 Aug 2023 71 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

17 items
3 Conclusion Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and Regulations 2001 require reform.

We conclude the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 require reform.

Government response. The government rejects the conclusion, stating it has no plans for fundamental reform of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 or the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, believing current legislation is appropriate and compatible with a balanced approach.
Home Office
4 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Reform 1971 Act and 2001 Regulations, integrating public health with law enforcement.

We recommend that the UK Government reform the 1971 Act and 2001 Regulations in a way that promotes a greater role for public health in our response to drugs, whilst maintaining our law enforcement to tackling the illicit production and supply of controlled drugs.

Government response. The government rejects the recommendation for reform, stating it has no plans for fundamental changes to the 1971 Act or 2001 Regulations, believing existing legislation supports a balanced public health and law enforcement approach.
Home Office
5 Conclusion Third Report - Drugs Rejected

A wider review of Schedule 1 controlled drugs is urgently required.

We welcome the ACMD’s work reviewing the status of drugs controlled under Schedule 1 to the 2001 Regulations. However, we conclude a wider review is required.

Government response. The government rejects the conclusion that a wider review is required, stating it has no plans for a broad review and is satisfied with the current classification of most commonly used drugs, though it has acted on nitrous oxide.
Home Office
6 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Commission the ACMD to review drug classification and scheduling systems, with regular updates.

We recommend that the Home Office commission the ACMD to review whether the most commonly used controlled drugs in the UK are correctly classified under the 1971 Act and correctly scheduled under the 2001 Regulations based on the scientific evidence available. The Home Office must reform the classification system and …

Government response. The government rejects the recommendation for a broad, commissioned review of drug classifications and scheduling, stating it has no plans for such a review and is largely satisfied with current controls, noting the ACMD can also self-commission reviews.
Home Office
14 Conclusion Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Home Office selectively adopts ACMD advice on drug classification changes.

The ACMD seeks to provide scientific, evidence-based recommendations to support the development of evidence-based drug policy. We note that the Home Office appears more likely to adopt advice to increase the classification of a controlled drug than it is to adopt advice to reduce the classification of a controlled drug. …

Government response. The government acknowledges the essential role of ACMD advice but asserts its prerogative to make alternative decisions, taking into account other relevant factors to protect the public, even when differing from ACMD conclusions.
Home Office
15 Conclusion Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Home Office withholding of ACMD's 2016 report undermines transparency and established practice.

We are disappointed that the Home Office has repeatedly refused to publish the ACMD’s 2016 report, including to this Committee on a confidential basis. No other ACMD report remains unpublished and withholding this one contravenes established practice and undermines the ACMD’s transparency.

Government response. The government explicitly refuses to publish the 2016 ACMD paper or provide a confidential copy, explaining that the ACMD itself marked the paper as confidential and it would be inappropriate for the Home Office to publish it.
Home Office
16 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Publish the ACMD’s 2016 report or provide a confidential copy within one month.

We, once again, request that the Home Office publish the ACMD’s 2016 report. At the very least, we request that the Home Office provide us with a confidential copy of the document within one month of receiving this report. Failing that, the Government must explain in its response to this …

Government response. The government explicitly rejects the request to publish the 2016 ACMD report or provide a confidential copy, explaining that the paper was marked confidential by the ACMD itself and its publication would be inappropriate.
Home Office
41 Conclusion Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Evidence base required for safe consumption facilities across the United Kingdom.

An evidence base for a safe consumption facility in the UK is needed.

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation, stating it does not support safe consumption facilities, that there is no legal framework for them, and anyone operating one would be committing offences.
Home Office
42 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Support piloting of safe consumption facilities in areas of demonstrated local need.

We recommend that the Government support the piloting of safe consumption facilities in areas across the UK where there is deemed to be a need by local government and stakeholders.

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation to pilot safe consumption facilities, stating it does not support them and has no plans to create a legal framework due to existing offences.
Home Office
43 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Support Glasgow safe consumption facility pilot, creating legislative pathway and ensuring joint funding.

In particular, we recommend the Government support a pilot in Glasgow by creating a legislative pathway under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 that enables such a facility to operate legally. The pilot in Glasgow must be jointly funded by the Government and the Scottish Government. The Government must work …

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation to support and fund a pilot safe consumption facility in Glasgow and create a legislative pathway, citing its lack of support for such facilities and the absence of a legal framework.
Home Office
44 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Establish a national drug checking service in England for anonymous postal sample submission.

We recommend that the Home Office and Department of Health and Social Care jointly establish a national drug checking service in England to enable people to submit drug samples by post anonymously. We recommend the Home Office consult stakeholders on how best to implement the service. In particular, we recommend …

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation to establish a national drug checking service, stating it implies approval of illicit drug use and is contrary to their zero-tolerance strategy, though it highlighted existing systems for detecting new psychoactive substances.
Home Office
45 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Expand on-site drug checking services and establish a dedicated licensing scheme for temporary events.

We recommend the expansion of on-site drug checking services at temporary events such as music festivals and within the night-time economy. We recommend that the Home Office establish a dedicated licensing scheme for drug checking at such events before the start of the summer 2024 festival season. The scheme must …

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation to expand on-site drug checking services and establish a licensing scheme, arguing such services imply approval of illicit drug use and conflict with their zero-tolerance strategy.
Home Office
50 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Ensure sustainable supply of prescribed diamorphine for patients facing shortages.

We are concerned by reported shortages of prescribed diamorphine, particularly because of the serious impact they may have on the health and lives of patients. As prescribed diamorphine is a viable form of treatment in England, the Government must work with suppliers to ensure that a sustainable supply is available …

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation to ensure a sustainable supply of prescribed diamorphine, stating ongoing manufacturing issues, clinical advice to use morphine as a first-line alternative due to no clinical advantages of diamorphine, and reduced NHS usage.
Home Office
51 Conclusion Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Middlesbrough DAT programme impressive but lacked crucial joint local funding.

We support the use of DAT supported by wrap-around psychosocial support. The impressive Middlesbrough DAT programme that we witnessed held benefits for both the public health and criminal justice sectors. We are most disappointed that joint local funding from both the health and criminal justice sectors could not be secured …

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation, stating that local authorities are responsible for commissioning drug treatment interventions and deciding on funding based on local need and priorities.
Home Office
52 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Provide centralised funding to support Diamorphine Assisted Treatment, urgently re-establishing Middlesbrough's programme.

We repeat the ACMD’s 2016 recommendation that the Government provide centralised funding to support the provision of DAT for people with a chronic heroin dependency for whom other forms of OST have not been successful. The centralised funding should first be provided to Foundations Medical Practice in order to re-establish …

Government response. The government rejected the recommendation for centralised funding for DAT, reiterating that local authorities are responsible for commissioning and funding these interventions based on local needs.
Home Office
65 Conclusion Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Lack of NHS access to cannabis-based medicinal products for patients.

We support cannabis-based products for medicinal use (CBPMs) where there is an evidence base that it can be an effective form of treatment for managing conditions or symptoms. We welcome the ACMD conducting a further assessment of CBPMs following on from its 2020 report. However, we are concerned that there …

Government response. The government explicitly rejects the committee's underlying sentiment for greater access to unlicensed CBPMs, stating that prescribing medicinal cannabis is a clinical decision, not a matter for government policy. It maintains commitment to an evidence-based approach, encouraging research and establishing …
Home Office
66 Recommendation Third Report - Drugs Rejected

Widen NHS accessibility of unlicensed cannabis-based medicinal products before Parliament ends.

Pending the outcome of the ACMD’s review, we recommend that the Government widens the accessibility of unlicensed CBPMs on the NHS before the end of this Parliament.

Government response. The government explicitly rejects the recommendation to widen accessibility of unlicensed CBPMs, stating it is a clinical decision and that more evidence is needed to support routine prescribing. They encourage manufacturers to conduct research and are working to establish clinical …
Home Office

Oral evidence sessions

6 sessions
Date Witnesses
22 Feb 2023 Angela Constance · Scottish Government, Caroline Hart · Home Office, Marcus Starling · Home Office, Rt Hon Chris Philp MP · Home Office View ↗
29 Jun 2022 Charlie Doyle · British Transport Police, Dr Jack Spicer · University of the West of England, Dr Richard Lewis · National Police Chiefs’ Council and Chief Constable of Dyfed-Powys Police, Junior Smart OBE · St Giles Trust, Nicky Hill · Abianda, Steve Rodhouse · National Crime Agency View ↗
15 Jun 2022 Andy Dunbobbin · Police and Crime Commissioner for North Wales, David Sidwick, David Thorne · South Wales Police, John Campbell QPM · Thames Valley Police, Serena Kennedy · Merseyside Police, Zoe Metcalfe View ↗
25 May 2022 Councillor Joanne Harding · Local Government Association, Maggie Boreham · Hackney Council, Professor Dame Carol Black · Combating Drugs, Professor Jim McManus · Hertfordshire County Council View ↗
18 May 2022 Dr Emily Finch · Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, Dr Owen Bowden-Jones · Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, Professor David Nutt · Imperial College, London, Professor Jo Neill · Manchester University, Professor Ornella Corazza · Hertfordshire University, Professor Roger Knaggs · Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, Professor Stuart Reece · University of Western Australia View ↗
27 Apr 2022 Chloe Hartnell · Hodge Jones and Allen LLP, Dr Karenza Moore · Newcastle University, Dr Kojo Koram · Birkbeck College, University of London, Martin Powell · Transform Drug Policy Foundation, Niamh Eastwood · Release, Rudi Fortson QC · 25 Bedford Row Chambers View ↗

Correspondence

4 letters
DateDirectionTitle
23 Nov 2022 To cttee Letter from Minister for Crime, Policing and Fire on the Middlesbrough DAT prog…
2 Nov 2022 To cttee Letter from Public Health, Middlesbrough Council on closure of the Middlesbroug…
27 Oct 2022 From cttee Letter to the Minister for Policing and Crime on closure of Middlesbrough Diamo…
27 Oct 2022 From cttee Letter to Project ADDER on closure of Middlesbrough diamorphine assisted treatm…