Select committee: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

Conclusion 1

Seventh Report - Coronavirus Act 2020 Two Years On Published 18 Mar 2022 Paragraph 27
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Committee noted that sunset clauses, including their appropriate length, should be considered carefully for any future legislation. Whilst a useful legislative tool, they can allow for stronger and broader powers than would otherwise be passed by Parliament, and the Government recognised in their evidence that without the sunset clause, this legislation as a whole might not have been approved by Parliament in the way it was.

From: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Seventh Report - Coronavirus Act 2020 Two Years On (HC 978), paragraph 27, 18 March 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 18 May 2022 (deadline 18 May 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's report and says it continues to review the legal framework and lessons learned from COVID-19, with several matters left to the independent UK COVID-19 Inquiry.

  • On sunset clauses, the government "agrees that sunset clauses, including their length, should be considered carefully and explained to Parliament".
  • On amending provisions after Royal Assent, the government notes the Committee's view and says it is "standard legislative process that Parliament is not able to amend primary legislation once an Act has gained Royal Assent".
  • On reviewing individual provisions, the government says it "is still to be determined whether any additional centrally-coordinated review will take place" beyond the independent inquiry. Inquiry timing is a matter for its independent Chair.
  • On two-monthly reports, the government says it "will continue to publish" them, with detail "proportional to the provisions which remain in force".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error