Source · Select Committees · Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Recommendation 11
11
Accepted
Paragraph: 50
Inconsistent, opaque, and unaccountable recruitment processes for departmental Non-Executive Directors are unsatisfactory.
Conclusion
The Corporate Governance Code stipulates that non-executive board members should be appointed on merit through a fair and open process. The current Government Lead Non-Executive told the Committee that a small proportion of NEDs currently in post have been directly appointed and, since he took on the The Role of Non-Executive Directors in Government 35 role in March 2022, every post had been advertised on the Cabinet Office public appointments website. However, our evidence suggests that these practices have varied considerably over time and the Committee is concerned by the lack of consistency, accountability, and transparency surrounding how NEDs are recruited. We believe it is completely unsatisfactory that departments are not consistently providing information in the public domain about the process for appointing NEDs, nor abiding by the requirement to justify departures from the Corporate Governance Code in departments’ annual report and accounts. The Committee also recognises the potential impact that departing from a fair and open process may have on the diversity of the candidates and the composition of the board.
Government Response Summary
The government states that all NEBM appointments now comply with the Governance Code, ensuring transparency and consistency through public appointment processes. They agree that Code departures should be reported and will consider summarising these in the Government Lead Non-Executive's annual report.
Paragraph Reference:
50
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
All NEBM appointments are now regulated and all processes will comply with the Governance Code. This will include consulting the Commissioner and declaring any direct appointments. The Public Appointments website sets out the recruitment process for every advertised role. This information is in the public domain, is transparent and consistent. Paragraph 45 of the Committee’s report infers that 14 NEBMs who responded to the survey were appointed to their roles without being subject to a fair and open recruitment process (also see response to point 6). However, there are currently 11 NEBMs directly appointed, from the current cadre of 94 departmental Non-Executive Board Members. Of these, 7 are NEBM’s for the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology and were directly appointed, on an interim basis following establishment of the new department, pending a fair and open recruitment process for permanent appointees. We agree that any departures from the Corporate Governance Code should be reported in the annual report and accounts for the respective department. We will also consider summarising any code departures within the annual report of the Government Lead Non-Executive.