Source · Select Committees · International Development Committee

Ninth Report - Investment for development: The UK’s strategy towards Development Finance Institutions

International Development Committee HC 884 Published 15 September 2023
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
23 items (8 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 23 of 23 classified
Accepted 12
Accepted in Part 3
Deferred 6
Rejected 2
Filter by: Clear

Conclusions (2)

Observations and findings
1 Conclusion Rejected
Development finance institutions can make a substantive contribution to developing private markets in low- and middle-income countries by pioneering new and emerging industries, promoting positive change through investment activities and stimulating private-sector investment to develop markets. (Paragraph 11) Governance
Government Response Summary
The Government does not agree with appointing a non-voting government official to BII’s Board, arguing it would disrupt dynamics and duplicate existing oversight. It committed to maintaining best practice governance and periodically reviewing procedures.
View Details →
4 Conclusion Rejected
Para 34
The FCDO must work collaboratively with BII throughout its operations to deliver the International Development Strategy’s objective of supporting countries to grow thriving economies by 31 March 2024. It should do this at both country office and regional levels by sharing institutional knowledge and ensuring that BII’s investments complement the …
Government Response Summary
The Government already monitors the thematic and geographic split of BII investments through existing policies and reporting frameworks. However, it will not provide BII investment data alongside FCDO's annual ODA expenditure due to potential confusion, instead highlighting where this information can be found on BII's website. The response does not explicitly address the deadline or the mandate for building collaboration into country plans by March 2024.
View Details →