Source · Select Committees · International Development Committee

3rd Report - The Government’s efforts to achieve SDG2: Zero Hunger

International Development Committee HC 515 Published 18 March 2025
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
37 items (29 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 37 of 37 classified
Accepted 11
Accepted in Part 10
Acknowledged 1
Deferred 10
Not Addressed 2
Rejected 3
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations

10 results
6 Accepted in Part

UK poverty alleviation tools need greater sensitivity to smallholder farmers' vital role.

Recommendation
Smallholder farmers in low-income countries are vital players in sustainable food systems. We welcome some of the steps taken to assess the impact of new trade deals on low-income countries. Currently, though, there is more to be done to ensure … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially agrees, highlighting existing ODA programmes and trade agreement assessment frameworks that consider smallholder farmers. They do not believe a separate assessment is currently warranted but will consider it in 2026, subject to the Spending Review.
View Details →
7 Accepted in Part

Assess and adjust trade, agriculture, climate, and gender programmes for smallholder farmers.

Recommendation
We recommend the Government assess its trade, agriculture, climate and gender programmes against the impact they have on smallholder farmers. Where necessary, these programmes should be adjusted to mitigate harm against smallholder famers and to enhance their place within sustainable … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially agrees, stating existing safeguarding frameworks and impact assessments already consider smallholder farmers. It will consider a further impact assessment in 2026, but does not deem a separate assessment warranted at this stage due to the ongoing Spending Review.
View Details →
13 Accepted in Part

Ensure Official Development Assistance for nutrition and food security programming is predictable and long-term.

Recommendation
We recommend that the FCDO put measures in place to ensure that all Official Development Assistance committed to nutrition and food security related programming is predictable and long term, with better safeguards against, and warnings of, any changes to funding … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially agrees, acknowledging the value of predictable programming and noting the FCDO's ODA budget will have greater certainty. However, final 2025/26 allocations are pending the Spending Review, though they commit to managing funding changes responsibly and informing partners.
View Details →
15 Accepted in Part

UK trade policy needs to reflect SDG2 aspirations regarding food-insecure populations.

Recommendation
UK trade policy needs to reflect the Government’s aspirations for achieving SDG2 with a continued commitment to comprehensive assessments of the impact of trade deals on food-insecure populations and a focus on reforming trading rules that compound food insecurity. (Conclusion, … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially agrees, stating it already has frameworks for assessing trade deals and ODA impact, and will consider further impact assessments in 2026, depending on the Spending Review.
View Details →
18 Accepted in Part

Demonstrate top-level government commitment to UK leadership in tackling global hunger challenges.

Recommendation
Successive UK Governments have been innovative and effective leaders in the efforts to tackle hunger. The UK has the convening power and expertise to be a considerable force for good in tackling the challenges of international fundraising, trade reform, climate … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states its commitment to maintaining leadership on food security and nutrition, citing the launch of the Global Compact on Nutrition Integration. However, it defers setting out a roadmap for future pledges until the Spending Review is finalised in 2025.
View Details →
19 Accepted in Part

Government has an excellent opportunity to demonstrate leadership on SDG2 at Nutrition for Growth.

Recommendation
The Government has an excellent opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to leadership on SDG2 by doing everything it can to ensure that the Nutrition for Growth summit is a success. We wait with anticipation for the announcements the Government intends … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government launched the Global Compact on Nutrition Integration to boost impact and leverage finance for nutrition across sectors. However, it was unable to make a funding commitment at the summit due to an ongoing Spending Review and will explore future pledges in 2025.
View Details →
28 Accepted in Part

Ensure long-term financial support for RUTF/MMS and pledge £50m to the Child Nutrition Fund.

Recommendation
The Government should work with governments and organisations to ensure continued long-term, predictable financial support for Ready-to use Therapeutic Foods and Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation packs, to address the needs of children and pregnant women in humanitarian situations. This should support … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially agrees, accepting the importance of predictable, long-term funding for nutrition commodities, local production, and partnership. They highlight existing significant contributions to the Child Nutrition Fund (CNF) and successful support for local RUTF production, but defer a decision on a specific £50 million pledge pending the Spending Review.
View Details →
31 Accepted in Part

Sustained focus on underlying hunger causes and whole-of-government approach remains crucial.

Recommendation
We are encouraged that the department appears to understand the importance of harmonising development programming and the importance of considering issues of age, gender, nutrition and food security across the piece. However, it is important that this Government build on … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees in principle to a common, coordinated, whole-of-government approach to fighting hunger, with FCDO collaborating with other departments. However, it defers decisions on delivery frameworks for future work until the completion of the ongoing Spending Review.
View Details →
34 Accepted in Part

Integrate SDG2 as a cross-cutting issue across diplomatic activity, mandating reporting by heads of missions.

Recommendation
Beyond the Nutrition for Growth summit, we encourage the Government to see SDG2 as an issue of vital strategic importance to the UK’s national and international interests. Consequently, it should be adopted as a cross- cutting issue across diplomatic activity … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees to prioritize SDG2 as a cross-cutting issue within FCDO, committing to developing a roadmap for its Global Nutrition Integration Compact in 2025. However, it defers action on making it a broader cross-government priority, citing capacity limits and the ongoing spending review.
View Details →
36 Accepted in Part

Provide clear guidance for commissioning research coherent with hunger-fighting aspirations and food systems.

Recommendation
The Government needs to ensure that research is coherent with its aspirations to fighting hunger and considers the inter-related factors facing nutrition and food systems. As part of the Zero Hunger delivery framework there should be clear guidance on this … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees research must address interconnected factors impacting nutrition and food systems, highlighting its existing food systems approach and the Gilbert Initiative. The response does not, however, explicitly commit to providing new clear guidance for those commissioning research.
View Details →