Select committee: International Development Committee

Conclusion 16

8th Report - Empowering Development: Energy Access for Communities Published 14 Nov 2025 Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Conventional value-for-money frameworks overlook long-term social benefits, which undervalues inclusive, community-led approaches. The Government’s efforts to advance inclusivity are further constrained by the limited availability of disaggregated data on how energy systems affect women, people with disabilities, or other marginalised groups. (Conclusion, Paragraph 57)

From: International Development Committee, 8th Report - Empowering Development: Energy Access for Communities (HC 849), 14 November 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 22 January 2026 (deadline 14 January 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government gives a mixed response to the Committee's report, marking most recommendations "Partially Agree" and a smaller number "Agree", while stating it is unable to make firm commitments beyond FY25/26 budgets.

  • On protecting energy access funding, it "intend[s] to continue this work" but says it is "not reasonable to expect that energy access investments can be fully protected" with ODA moving to 0.3% of GNI.
  • It marks "Agree" on making inclusive community participation a condition of funding, and on a clear definition of clean energy, which it sets out as "Low and zero carbon energy generation sources" and which "does not include nuclear energy".
  • It says it is "unable to commit" to reporting on GEDSI guidance implementation by June 2026, or to adopting a multi-dimensional evaluation framework by June 2026, with any decision depending on "future resourcing beyond FY25/26".
  • On multi-year funding, it "aim[s] to prioritise multi-year planning and greater programming predictability, subject to future years’ budget allocations".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error