Select committee: International Development Committee

Conclusion 9

8th Report - Empowering Development: Energy Access for Communities Published 14 Nov 2025 Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Energy projects are often technology-driven, which heightens the risks associated with limited local ownership and maintenance capacity. Emphasis should not be placed on rapid deployment or narrow output targets, but rather on meaningful community involvement. When engagement is top-down or superficial, legitimacy, sustainability, and long- term impact are compromised. (Conclusion, Paragraph 44)

From: International Development Committee, 8th Report - Empowering Development: Energy Access for Communities (HC 849), 14 November 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 22 January 2026 (deadline 14 January 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government gives a mixed response to the Committee's report, marking most recommendations "Partially Agree" and a smaller number "Agree", while stating it is unable to make firm commitments beyond FY25/26 budgets.

  • On protecting energy access funding, it "intend[s] to continue this work" but says it is "not reasonable to expect that energy access investments can be fully protected" with ODA moving to 0.3% of GNI.
  • It marks "Agree" on making inclusive community participation a condition of funding, and on a clear definition of clean energy, which it sets out as "Low and zero carbon energy generation sources" and which "does not include nuclear energy".
  • It says it is "unable to commit" to reporting on GEDSI guidance implementation by June 2026, or to adopting a multi-dimensional evaluation framework by June 2026, with any decision depending on "future resourcing beyond FY25/26".
  • On multi-year funding, it "aim[s] to prioritise multi-year planning and greater programming predictability, subject to future years’ budget allocations".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error