Select committee: International Development Committee

Recommendation 12

First Report - Racism in the aid sector Published 23 Jun 2022 Paragraph 34 Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The terminology used in the aid sector has its roots in colonialism; it ‘others’ the communities where programmes are delivered and reinforces ideas that ‘the West’ is the ideal that others should aspire to. It is not easy to strip the sector of terms such as ‘recipient’ or ‘beneficiary’, even the term ‘aid’ adds to this narrative.

From: International Development Committee, First Report - Racism in the aid sector (HC 150), paragraph 34, 23 June 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 23 January 2023 (deadline 23 August 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it takes racism in the aid sector seriously and is already working to address it, but it declines some recommendations, including a review of reserved department status and requiring funded organisations to publish diversity data.

  • On local partners, it states that the FCDO "does not value international expertise over local expertise" and points to existing measures, including a 10% Social Value weighting in tender evaluations and a Due Diligence Hub.
  • On reserved department status, it says "There is currently no plan to review" it, citing the threat to FCDO staff from state actors.
  • On diversity data, it says requiring funded organisations to publish it "may not always be either appropriate or possible". It does not currently publish ethnicity pay gap data, and the Cabinet Office "is expected to issue guidance" in 2023.
  • On terminology, it says it is "exploring taking part" in the sector debate led by Bond. On convening, it will "continue to look for opportunities" to support the sector on inclusion.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error