Select committee: International Development Committee
FCDO and disability-inclusive development
Closed
Opened 12 Jul 2023
Closed 23 May 2024
8 recommendations
9 conclusions
International Development Committee Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
Report and Government response published This inquiry considered consider the adequacy and effectiveness of the FCDO’s disability and inclusion rights strategy, launched in February 2022, including the consequences for disability-inclusive programmes of the decision to cut aid spending from 0.7% to 0.5% of GNI. Stakeholders noted that Organisations of Persons with Disabilities are consulted arbitrarily and without obligation, making it all too common that policy decisions affecting people with disabilities are made without their direct input. Disability inclusion hasn’t been sufficiently integrated even into the FCDO’s own policy-making procedures, while the Disability Inclusion and Rights Strategy receives little to no mention across other departmental strategies. Disability inclusion does not appear to be at the forefront of Government thinking. Beyond “routine” programming, the Committee also heard that Government does not pay enough attention to the needs of people with disabilities in its planning for humanitarian responses, or in climate adaptation. Despite the increasing impact of climate change and the constant and growing threat of conflict, the FCDO’s approach risks persons with disabilities being overlooked at times of crisis. Read the Report: FCDO and disability-inclusive development
Where it stands
The inquiry is closed, opened 12 July 2023.
The committee has published 1 report, most recently Third Report - FCDO and disability-inclusive development on 4 April 2024.
The government's response
Published 13 January 2025. The deadline was 4 June 2024.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government welcomes the Committee's report and sets out agree, partially agree or similar positions on the recommendations, with a refreshed strategy to be announced on 2 April 2025.
- On the delivery plan, it "partially agrees" with publication: the updated plan "will be published" following completion of the strategy review process currently underway.
- It agrees to reference the UN CRPD definition of disability, stating "We will ensure the definition is referenced explicitly in any future iterations of the strategy and delivery plan."
- On Department-wide disability targets, it partially agrees but says it "will not be possible" to complete the process by March 2025, as the OECD-DAC proposal will not have been considered by then; it will then "explore options for a target".
- On value for money, it agrees and says it "intend[s] to update the equity and value for money guide" and will provide an additional update by the stated deadline of April 2025.
Recommendations and conclusions
- 1: FCDO knew ODA cuts would significantly harm people with disabilities despite global leadership.Conclusion
- 2: Major shortcomings apparent in application of FCDO's Disability Inclusion and Rights Strategy.Conclusion
- 3: Publish the delivery plan alongside the Department's report response and subsequent iterations.Recommendation
Reports
- Third Report - FCDO and disability-inclusive development4 April 2024 · 17 items
Evidence
- 2 oral evidence sessionsLatest 23 January 2024
- 7 witnesses
Recent activity
- 1st Special Report - FCDO and disability-inclusive development: Government Response13 January 2025, Report published
- Third Report - FCDO and disability-inclusive development4 April 2024, Report published
- FCDO and disability-inclusive development; UK Small Island Developing States Strategy23 January 2024, Oral evidence
Recommendations and conclusions 17 shown
Globally, the UK has been at the forefront of advancing disability inclusion across development programmes. However, as equality impact assessments published in recent years confirm, the FCDO knew that Official Development Assistance cuts would significantly harm people with disabilities.
2: Major shortcomings apparent in application of FCDO's Disability Inclusion and Rights Strategy.
Concluded (the committee's words)The Disability Inclusion and Rights Strategy provides an excellent framework for improving the disability-inclusivity of the FCDO’s development portfolio. However, major shortcomings have become apparent in the application of the strategy, which are set out in later chapters of this Report.
3: Publish the delivery plan alongside the Department's report response and subsequent iterations.
Recommended (the committee's words)The Department should publish the delivery plan alongside its response to this Report, with all subsequent iterations published on completion.
4: Include UN Convention definition of disability in future delivery plan and Strategy updates.
Recommended (the committee's words)The Department should include in future iterations of the delivery plan, and any update to the Disability Inclusion and Rights Strategy, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities definition of disability, to ensure that stakeholders are clear on who the Department is targeting development spending towards, and why.
5: Disability inclusion not sufficiently integrated into FCDO policy-making procedures and departmental strategies.
Concluded (the committee's words)Despite Government commitments, disability inclusion has not been sufficiently integrated into the FCDO’s policy-making procedures: the Disability Inclusion and Rights Strategy receives little to no mention across other departmental strategies, suggesting that disability inclusion is not at the forefront of departmental thinking.
6: ODA spending on disability inclusion falls short, lacking measurable targets like gender equality.
Concluded (the committee's words)ODA spending on disability inclusion, as measured by the OECD-DAC markers, falls short of our expectations. Whereas efforts to improve gender equality across the Department’s development programmes are assessed against measurable spending targets, disability inclusion does not receive the same focus.
7: Introduce Department-wide targets on disability inclusion by March 2025, reporting progress by September.
Concluded (the committee's words)The FCDO must introduce Department-wide targets on disability inclusion, as measured by the OECD-DAC markers, by March 2025, reporting progress to this Committee by September 2025.
8: FCDO has failed to implement its commitments on disaggregated disability data collection.
Concluded (the committee's words)The FCDO acknowledges the importance of disaggregated data collection, and has in the past made repeated commitments to disaggregate data by disability. However, as acknowledged by the Second Permanent Under-Secretary at the FCDO, Nick Dyer, this has not been undertaken. We fail to understand how the FCDO and disability-inclusive development 29 Department can properly target resources or develop and disseminate best practice across development programmes if it does not know who it is helping and where.
9: Include specific, measurable disability data disaggregation policies in the DIRS delivery plan.
Recommended (the committee's words)We recommend that the FCDO includes specific, measurable data disaggregation policies, guided by the UNCRPD definition of disability, in the upcoming iteration of the Disability Inclusion and Rights Strategy delivery plan, which it should then share with stakeholders and delivery partners. All bilateral ODA projects should include these targets from now on.
10: FCDO's current programming fails to adequately safeguard people with disabilities from exploitation.
Concluded (the committee's words)People with disabilities are significantly more at risk of sexual exploitation, as well as other forms of exploitation, highlighting the importance of their appropriate safeguarding. However, we are not convinced that the FCDO is doing all it can to properly safeguard people with disabilities in its programming.
11: Ensure FCDO programming does not perpetuate the negative impacts of mass institutionalisation.
Recommended (the committee's words)We have heard worrying indications that mass institutionalising of people with disabilities can have negative impacts. The FCDO should consider this in its programming, and to ensure that none of its programming perpetuates the negative impact of mass institutionalisation.
12: Review FCDO value for money approach to safeguard people with disabilities in programmes.
Recommended (the committee's words)The FCDO should review its approach to securing value for money in development programmes, to ensure that these considerations do not impact on the ability of programmes to effectively safeguard people with disabilities, reporting progress to the Committee within one year of publication of this Report.
13: Set out FCDO steps and metrics for ending mass institutionalisation of children with disabilities.
Recommended (the committee's words)In its response to this Report, the FCDO should set out what steps it has taken to end the mass institutionalising of children with disabilities, as well as sharing with the Committee the metrics by which the Department measures its performance in this area.
14: FCDO is failing to adequately engage with Organisations of Persons with Disabilities (OPDs).
Concluded (the committee's words)The FCDO is not adequately fulfilling its commitment to the “Nothing about us without us” campaign for engagement with Organisations of Persons with Disabilities (OPDs), which risks undermining support and buy-in for its development programmes from people with disabilities and OPDs.
15: Amend DIRS delivery plan to ensure consultation with Organisations of Persons with Disabilities (OPDs).
Recommended (the committee's words)The next iteration of the DIRS delivery plan should be amended to ensure that Organisations of Persons with Disabilities are consulted on any policies that may affect them.
16: Disability-inclusive programming is insufficiently mandated across FCDO crisis response policy documents.
Concluded (the committee's words)Despite the increasing importance of climate change adaption, as well as the constant threat of conflict, disability-inclusive programming is not sufficiently mandated across FCDO policy documents, risking persons with disabilities being overlooked at times of crisis.
17: Lead review of humanitarian and climate policies for stronger disability inclusion commitments.
Recommended (the committee's words)Led by its Gender & Equalities Department and Disability Inclusion Team, the FCDO should lead Government efforts to review all humanitarian response and climate change adaption policies, ensuring that each includes stronger commitments on ensuring that disability inclusion is properly considered and funded.
Reports
Third Report - FCDO and disability-inclusive development
- HC No.
- HC 107
- Published
- 4 Apr 2024
- Items
- 17
- Government response
- Government response published 13 January 2025 (deadline 4 June 2024). Read the government's response ↗
Oral evidence sessions
On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.
| Date | Session and witnesses | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Jan 2024 |
FCDO and disability-inclusive development; UK Small Island Developing States Strategy
Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell · Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
|
View ↗ |
| 17 Oct 2023 |
FCDO and disability-inclusive development
Anna Landre · Disaster Strategies,
Iryna Tekuchova · Fight for Right,
Kevin Sudi · CBM,
Ms Lauren Watters · Able Child Africa,
Ophia Bwanali · Leonard Cheshire Zimbabwe,
Sunday Isiyaku · Sightsavers
|
View ↗ |
Who gave evidence
On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.
| Witness | Organisation | Sessions |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Landre · Global Research and Response Lead | Disaster Strategies | 1 |
| Iryna Tekuchova · Researcher | Fight for Right | 1 |
| Kevin Sudi · Kenya Country Team Programme Manager | CBM | 1 |
| Ms Lauren Watters · Director of Delivery and Impact | Able Child Africa | 1 |
| Ophia Bwanali · Lower Limb Prosthetic Technologist | Leonard Cheshire Zimbabwe | 1 |
| Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell · Minister of State | Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office | 1 |
| Sunday Isiyaku · Country Director for Nigeria and Ghana | Sightsavers | 1 |