Source · Select Committees · Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
Sixth Report - Funding for Levelling Up
Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
HC 744
Published 26 May 2023
Recommendations
4
Accepted
Prioritise flexible revenue funding for local authorities and reduce bid-based allocations.
Recommendation
As a starting principle, local authorities who most require prioritising within the Levelling Up policy should be allocated money through revenue to achieve objectives that are in line with their local circumstances and need, with the appropriate monitoring and expenditure …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government highlights its published plan for simplifying the funding landscape and its commitment to launch a Funding Simplification Doctrine in 2024, which will encourage allocative approaches over competitive bids where suitable. It cites the UKSPF as a non-competitive fund with a mix of revenue and capital funding, empowering local leaders with flexibility.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details →
11
Accepted
Para 40
Encourage collaboration between communities and local authorities in competitive bidding processes.
Recommendation
The nature of competitive bidding can result in resentment between communities and similar neighbouring authorities across the country. Communities and local 38 Funding for Levelling Up authorities should be encouraged to work together, and the Government should be mindful of …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the administrative burden of competitive bidding and states the upcoming funding simplification doctrine will balance its approach. It commits to working with local authorities to ensure fair and transparent distribution of competitive funding and to encouraging collaboration, citing existing capacity grants and provisions for joint bids in the Levelling Up Fund.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details →
13
Accepted
Para 49
Prohibit DLUHC from introducing additional metrics, or mandate public communication of changes.
Recommendation
Throughout all future competitive bidding processes, the Government must avoid introducing additional metrics for success once an application process has closed. If, for any reason, this becomes unavoidable, the DLUHC must communicate this change via official and public channels of …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government refutes the claim of introducing new metrics, stating its decision-making framework was published at the outset. It adds that it has provided £65 million in additional funding to support local authorities with project development, including adapting to inflation impacts.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details →
17
Accepted
Para 64
Require DLUHC to utilise local government data expertise and ensure clear data sources.
Recommendation
The DLUHC should not seek to fix something which is not broken. Rather than outsourcing the collection of new data sets, the Department should have called on the expertise of bodies such as the Local Government Association and offices within …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government defends its data collection approach, explaining that its chosen indicators align with Levelling Up Fund interventions and that data sources are primarily government statistical releases, with links provided in published methodology notes. It states it chose to gather data from original sources rather than relying on aggregated data.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details →
19
Accepted
Para 66
Publish DLUHC departmental and combined authority expenditure data for public monitoring.
Recommendation
One of our core tasks is to monitor the policy of the DLUHC and without sufficient data we are limited in our ability to do so. We are concerned that the lack of accessible data was not foreseen or resolved …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government outlines ongoing efforts to make data publicly available, including through the Subnational Indicators Explorer and a subnational expenditure project. It also states that an Annual Report on Devolution will be published by March 2024, and the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill will mandate annual progress reports.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details →
21
Accepted
Publish annual data production plans and availability timelines for the SDU
Recommendation
The delay and lack of information regarding what the SDU is working on, what the Unit intends to produce and when these data sets will be available, is unsatisfactory. The DLUHC, via the SDU, must make clear at the start …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government outlines the Spatial Data Unit's (SDU) ongoing work to transform data use, including subnational expenditure projects, partnerships with the ONS for local statistics, and the development of public tools like the Subnational Indicators Explorer, updated quarterly. It highlights various published data outputs and collaborative efforts.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details →
29
Accepted
Para 104
Ensure ongoing, detailed, and sufficient DLUHC engagement with Devolved Governments on funding distribution
Recommendation
Where the DLUHC is seeking to provide funding in [policy] areas that are generally understood to be devolved, it is critical that the Department works hand in glove with the Devolved Governments. As such, through good communication and close collaboration, …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government describes its existing and past close collaboration with devolved administrations on Levelling Up, citing examples like joint Freeport announcements, seeking input on the Levelling Up Fund, and developing bespoke interventions for the UKSPF, asserting it is already working closely across the UK.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details →
31
Accepted
Engage with Northern Ireland officials through existing structures, ensuring Section 75 compatibility.
Recommendation
In the future, the DLUHC must make sure that its engagement with officials in Northern Ireland is compatible with section 75 of the 1998 Northern Ireland Act, so 42 Funding for Levelling Up that in the absence of an Executive, …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government outlines existing measures to ensure engagement with Northern Ireland officials is compatible with Section 75 of the 1998 Northern Ireland Act, including requiring UKSPF applicants to describe project impact and using MoUs for the Levelling Up Fund, while acknowledging the challenge of a non-functioning Executive.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details →
34
Accepted
Adopt a sustained, long-term approach to Levelling Up with secure, ongoing funding.
Recommendation
We note the significant cross-party consensus there appears to be for the challenges that the Levelling Up policy is seeking to solve. We recommend that future Governments take a more sustained and long-term approach to levelling up matched by ongoing …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states that the Levelling Up policy is already a long-term program, with missions set until 2030 and provisions for continuation beyond. They also reference a simplification plan to streamline funding and reduce duplication, claiming existing efforts address the recommendation.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details →
Conclusions (10)
5
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 25
The Levelling Up White Paper committed the Department to simplify funding streams and reducing the requirements to access competitive bidding. Despite this, we have seen limited evidence that any progress has been made on these objectives to date. Furthermore, the evidence we received on competitive funding has indicated the challenges …
Government Response Summary
The government states it published a plan on 4 July 2023 for simplifying funding and will launch a Funding Simplification Doctrine in 2024 to guide appropriate distribution methodologies. It also highlights the UK Shared Prosperity Fund which provides formula-based allocation rather than competitive bidding.
6
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 26
It was made clear by our witnesses that competitive bidding is a resource intensive and costly activity. This can create barriers for stakeholders and communities in need of funding. Whilst limited funding was provided for some local authorities in the Funding for Levelling Up 37 Levelling Up Fund round one …
Government Response Summary
The government outlines its plan for simplifying the funding landscape, published on 4 July 2023, and commits to launching a Funding Simplification Doctrine in 2024. This doctrine will assess the most suitable distribution methodology, encouraging allocative approaches where appropriate to minimize demands on local authorities.
8
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 30
We heard evidence which brought into question the extent of support provided to applicants or unsuccessful applicants by DLUHC. There is a wide gap in perception between the quality of feedback the DLUHC said it had provided and the quality of feedback applicants said they had received. DLUHC does not …
Government Response Summary
The government confirms it provided feedback to unsuccessful applicants in both rounds, improving the process in round two by providing detailed written feedback based on lessons learned from round one. They note receiving positive feedback on the round two process.
18
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 65
We are concerned about the DLUHC’s lack of sufficient data on all aspects relating to levelling up. The Department has acknowledged that it lacks data of sufficient quality about Government department’s expenditure on the full range of levelling up funds. It also lacks data on combined authority income and expenditure. …
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges data concerns but states good progress is being made on metrics, with new data publicly available. They also note the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill will require annual reports and DLUHC is working to publish subnational expenditure data, with an annual report on devolution due by March 2024.
20
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 67
The DLUHC’s solution to its lack of data appears to have been the creation of the ‘Spatial Data Unit’ (SDU). The SDU was set up over a year ago and since then we have sought to understand the work of this unit and their forward plan. However, it remains unclear …
Government Response Summary
The government clarifies that the Spatial Data Unit (SDU) is transforming data use for place-based decision-making and is already producing granular data, such as LSOA Gross Value Added (GVA) and improved R&D expenditure estimates. The SDU is also supporting the Subnational Indicators Explorer, which is updated quarterly.
22
Conclusion
Accepted
According to the Financial Times, concerns about the DLUHC’s ability to deliver ‘value for money’ have been raised by the Treasury. Despite DLUHC’s efforts to reassure us, the Treasury’s decision to remove DLUHC’s ability to sign off on capital expenditure is a significant concern. The DHLUC needs to make clear …
Government Response Summary
The government clarifies that the change in capital expenditure sign-off only relates to new projects and has no implications for DLUHC's budgets, policy objectives, or the delivery of Levelling Up. They cite recent funding announcements as evidence of continued investment.
27
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 102
The DLUHC has told us that it consulted with the Devolved Governments on the creation, compatibility, and implementation of the levelling up funds. However, we have heard from the Scottish and Welsh Governments, and officials from the Northern Ireland Executive, that they have not been satisfied with the level of …
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges shared goals with devolved administrations and outlines its existing close working relationship and consultation efforts across various levelling up initiatives, including joint Freeports, seeking advice on the Levelling Up Fund, and engaging on UKSPF interventions.
28
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 103
We have also heard from the Scottish and Welsh Governments, and officials from the Northern Ireland Executive, that levelling up funding was not always compatible with devolved policy and that the method of distribution was not appropriate. The Multiply fund is an example of the UK Government not providing value …
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges shared goals with devolved administrations and asserts they are working closely across various levelling up areas, citing examples like joint Freeports, and consultations on the Levelling Up Fund and UKSPF to agree bespoke interventions and align with priorities. They do not directly address the specific "wasteful" criticism of the Multiply fund.
30
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 105
The lack of consideration for the circumstances in which the Executive and its Officials in Northern Ireland operate is of even greater concern to us and speaks to an on- going theme we found throughout this inquiry regarding the extent of consultation carried out by the DLUHC with Devolved Governments …
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the importance of Section 75 considerations for Northern Ireland. They state that for UKSPF, applicants must describe impacts and collect data on protected characteristics, and they will further embed these considerations. For the Levelling Up Fund, they explain that Memorandums of Understanding were used to ensure compliance with Section 75 principles and allow official engagement without legal risk.
32
Conclusion
Accepted
Para 109
The Government’s flagship Levelling Up policy is one in a long line of local growth initiatives. The National Audit Office reported that since 2010 there has been the repeated introduction of ‘new’ local growth policies. The stop-start character of local growth initiatives has arguably slowed or even in some case …
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the historic stop-start approach to local growth and states that Levelling Up is a long-term programme, with the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill enabling missions to continue beyond 2030. It also refers to a recently published simplification plan to improve the current funding system.