Source · Select Committees · Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
Recommendation 47
47
Paragraph: 185
We disagree with the regulator’s assertion that intervening to shape the market - for example,...
Conclusion
We disagree with the regulator’s assertion that intervening to shape the market - for example, to encourage providers to consolidate their stock in particular areas - would take the regulator beyond its duty to minimise interference. As we have stated elsewhere, we think it should reinterpret this duty, as its current interpretation has resulted in a regulator that is simply too passive.
Paragraph Reference:
185
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 24 October 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗