Select committee: Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
Conclusion 23
Fifth Report - Reforming the Private Rented Sector
Published 9 Feb 2023
Paragraph 126
Addressed to Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee Reforming the Private Rented Sector All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
When a tenant objects to an in-tenancy rent increase, they can refer their case to the First-tier Property Tribunal, which determines the market rent for the property. The Government says it will remove the tribunal’s power to increase rents and thereby give tenants greater confidence to challenge unjustified increases. If this proposal has the desired effect, it ought to result in a heavier workload for the tribunal, yet the process is time-consuming and resource-intensive, as it relies on each individual property being physically inspected and on both parties presenting evidence of local market rents based on online listings. This is inefficient and results in uncertainty for both landlords and tenants around what a justified increase would be.
From: Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee, Fifth Report - Reforming the Private Rented Sector (HC 624), paragraph 126, 9 February 2023
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 20 October 2023 (deadline 9 April 2023).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government welcomes "the thrust of the report" and accepts or reflects the Committee's aims in several areas, but declines a number of recommendations, including on student tenancies, a Housing Court and rent review clauses.
- On antisocial behaviour, it "fully agree[s] with the intent" of the recommendation but proposes a different approach: it will lower the threshold for Ground 14 and maintain judicial discretion instead of making the ground mandatory.
- On courts, it says "We do not agree that introducing a Housing Court is the best way", and it "would not be practical" to prioritise rent arrears cases. It will not proceed with the abolition of section 21 "until reforms to the justice system are in place".
- It does not support retaining fixed terms for students, saying it "would unfairly lock students into contracts". It will instead introduce a new ground for possession to facilitate the yearly cycle of student tenancies.
- On enforcement funding, it will ensure that "where necessary" new costs to local authorities "are fully funded", in accordance with the New Burdens Doctrine. It has "no current plans to criminalise non-payment of a civil penalty".