Recommendations & Conclusions
5 items
2
Recommendation
3rd Report: Building more social housing
Rejected
We believe rents are only affordable when they do not exceed one third of household income. There are numerous ways to define this income and other related factors and the Government should identify its preferred method, in consultation with the Local Government Association, the National Housing Federation, Shelter, and other …
Read more
We believe rents are only affordable when they do not exceed one third of household income. There are numerous ways to define this income and other related factors and the Government should identify its preferred method, in consultation with the Local Government Association, the National Housing Federation, Shelter, and other key players in the sector. It is crucial that the Government links local incomes to a definition of affordability, rather than using “affordable” as a synonym for below market rent or market value.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation to identify a preferred national definition of affordability linked to local incomes, stating it does not prescribe such a definition and that affordability is better understood at a local level through existing frameworks.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
7
Recommendation
3rd Report: Building more social housing
Rejected
There is compelling evidence that England needs at least 90,000 net additional social rent homes a year. We recommend that the Government publishes annual net addition targets for the following tenures: social rent, affordable rent, intermediate rent and affordable homeownership. This will improve transparency and accountability of the Government’s record …
Read more
There is compelling evidence that England needs at least 90,000 net additional social rent homes a year. We recommend that the Government publishes annual net addition targets for the following tenures: social rent, affordable rent, intermediate rent and affordable homeownership. This will improve transparency and accountability of the Government’s record on affordable housing. It will also make clear the contribution affordable housing will make to the Government’s 300,000 new homes per year target. This is crucial as housebuilding in England has only ever surpassed 300,000 in a year when social housing has made a significant contribution.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government explicitly states that it does not place a specific figure on the annual number of affordable houses which need to be built. It reaffirms commitment to increasing supply and building the right homes, supported by the new £11.5bn Affordable Homes Programme.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
8
Conclusion
3rd Report: Building more social housing
Rejected
It is disappointing that the Government does not have a published plan on social housing, nor has its own assessment of social housing need. We regard an estimate of need to be essential to calculating how much investment the Government may need to make to meet social housing need and …
Read more
It is disappointing that the Government does not have a published plan on social housing, nor has its own assessment of social housing need. We regard an estimate of need to be essential to calculating how much investment the Government may need to make to meet social housing need and deliver such a “step change”.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government does not commit to producing a published plan or its own assessment of social housing need, stating that it does not place a specific figure on the number of affordable houses needed annually, but is committed to increasing supply through existing programmes.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
22
Conclusion
3rd Report: Building more social housing
Rejected
The purpose of Right to Buy is to introduce a route into homeownership, and not reduce the number of social homes or to supplement the private rented sector.
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the implication that Right to Buy should not lead to homes supplementing the private rented sector, stating that tenants who have bought their homes should have the same freedoms as other homeowners, including letting their property.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
23
Recommendation
3rd Report: Building more social housing
Rejected
We recommend that, in line with the five year period which covers discount repayment, the Government prevents Right to Buy homes being privately let within five years of purchase. This will require legislating to implement a covenant against letting for a five year period. This is not without precedent: Help …
Read more
We recommend that, in line with the five year period which covers discount repayment, the Government prevents Right to Buy homes being privately let within five years of purchase. This will require legislating to implement a covenant against letting for a five year period. This is not without precedent: Help to Buy properties include a covenant which prevents private renting. The Government’s justification is that Help to Buy is designed to assist you to move on or up the housing ladder, words that could apply just as aptly to Right to Buy.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejected the recommendation, stating that Right to Buy tenants should have the same freedoms as other homeowners, including the ability to let their properties.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government