Select committee: Foreign Affairs Committee

Conclusion 5

Fourth Report: A brave new Britain? The future of the UK’s international policy Published 22 Oct 2020 Paragraph 6 Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Conclusion (the committee's words)
An increasingly assertive and revisionist China has created geo-political friction with a more introspective United States. China and Russia, as leading authoritarian and revisionist powers, have also been more adept than their ideological rivals at realising where their capacity for international influence lies and harnessing the full spectrum of such capabilities.

From: Foreign Affairs Committee, Fourth Report: A brave new Britain? The future of the UK’s international policy (HC 380), paragraph 6, 22 October 2020

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 13 January 2021 (deadline 22 December 2020).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees with many of the Committee's recommendations and its assessment of global trends, but disagrees with the characterisation of UK international policy as "adrift" and with the claim that Britain abroad is less than the sum of its parts.

  • It disagrees with the claim that "Britain abroad is less than the sum of its parts", saying the creation of the FCDO "enables integration of international development and foreign policy".
  • On the Integrated Review's priorities, it says it "would not want to prejudge" the review's outcomes on conflict resolution and soft power, and that the Review "will be published in the new year".
  • It does not agree on the need to establish diplomatic missions to leading technology companies, believing engagement "should utilise the existing relationships government holds with key businesses in the sector".
  • On aid, it says it will "return to spending 0.7 of GNI on ODA when the fiscal situation allows", having temporarily reduced spending to 0.5% of GNI.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error