Source · Select Committees · Foreign Affairs Committee
Recommendation 6
6
Paragraph: 20
The absence of the FCDO’s top leadership—both ministerial and official—when Kabul fell is a grave...
Conclusion
The absence of the FCDO’s top leadership—both ministerial and official—when Kabul fell is a grave indictment of the attitudes of the Government, representing a failure of leadership across the board in the Foreign Office. In particular, the fact that the department’s top civil servant did not return until the civilian evacuation was over, while staff across the department struggled to implement a poorly-planned evacuation process under intense pressure, is difficult to understand and impossible to excuse. While it is essential for those at all levels in Government to take leave, this must be tempered at the most senior level by the need to exercise leadership in a crisis. Despite expressions of regret from the then-Foreign Secretary and Permanent Under-Secretary, there was no discussion of this point in the department’s Lessons Learned review. In addition to the absence of the FCDO leadership in London, there was a gap on the ground in Kabul: the Government withdrew all FCDO consular staff from Kabul as the evacuation operation began and there was a 48-hour wait 54 Missing in action: UK leadership and the withdrawal from Afghanistan before their replacements arrived. This mismanagement and under-resourcing of the evacuation effort in a crucial period likely cost hundreds of people their chance to leave the country, and as a result likely cost lives.
Paragraph Reference:
20
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 29 July 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗