Source · Select Committees · Foreign Affairs Committee
Recommendation 27
27
Deferred
Explain the Government's current stance on RCEP and IPEF trade blocs.
Recommendation
[Neither the Integrated Review (IR) nor the Refresh mentions the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the world’s largest trade bloc, which, though China-dominated, includes the UK’s allies in the Indo-Pacific, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. (The UK is a founding member of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), another Chinese initiative). The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF, launched by the US in 2022) was not mentioned in the IR because it was formed after publication; however, it is also not mentioned in the Refresh.] These are major omissions. The Government should explain its stance towards these bodies, even if it is, as the Foreign Secretary has indicated, too early to decide on applying to join them. (Paragraph 91) Tilting horizons: the Integrated Review and the Indo-Pacific 69
Government response summary AI-generated
The government agrees with the committee on the importance of understanding China and commits to investing in civil servants' skills and knowledge in this area, but does not explain its stance towards the RCEP and IPEF trade blocs as recommended.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Government Response
Deferred
HM Government · verbatim extract
Deferred
Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF)
Read the full response on Parliament ↗