Select committee: Environmental Audit Committee

Conclusion 18

4th Report – Flood resilience in England Published 13 Oct 2025
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Experts have been clear: the UK is not investing at the scale required to keep pace with climate risk. This fragmented approach is leaving communities and infrastructure exposed and storing up greater costs for the future, and in real terms costing more than prevention measures due to disruption and damage to infrastructure and property. (Conclusion, Paragraph 70)

From: Environmental Audit Committee, 4th Report – Flood resilience in England (HC 550), 13 October 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 23 December 2025 (deadline 13 December 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it shares the committee's view on the importance of flood resilience, agrees with some recommendations, and in some cases notes or considers them rather than accepting them, while declining to formalise the Flood Resilience Taskforce's role.

  • On resilience standards, the government "notes" the recommendation and "will consider this as part of our existing commitment to explore a long-term target", with "a further statement next year".
  • It does not agree to formalise the Flood Resilience Taskforce's role, saying this "would complicate the responsibilities and accountabilities".
  • On making SuDS mandatory, it does not commit to commencing Schedule 3, saying improvement "could be achieved" by other means and it "will decide on which course of action to pursue in due course".
  • On a statutory duty for Fire and Rescue Services to respond to flooding, it is "assessing the case", with the work "planned to conclude in summer 2026".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error