Source · Select Committees · Environmental Audit Committee

Recommendation 13

13 Not Addressed Paragraph: 82

The relationship between environmental monitoring and remedial action is far too weak.

Recommendation
The relationship between environmental monitoring and remedial action is far too weak. This must change. Data on biodiversity levels must inform decision-making in Government far more substantially than at present.
Government response summary AI-generated
The government refers to recommendation 11 and states that spending plans beyond 2021-22 have not been set, with future plans to be agreed as part of SR21. This response does not address the committee's recommendation about strengthening the link between environmental monitoring and remedial action or how biodiversity data will inform decision-making more substantially.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Paragraph Reference: 82
Government Response Not Addressed
HM Government · verbatim extract Not Addressed
In formulating this recommendation, the EAC considered other indicators and metrics on biodiversity and wider natural capital beyond the information provided in the Environmental Accounts. We have therefore taken a consistent interpretation in our response. In England, through the Environment Bill, the government is introducing a statutory cycle of monitoring, planning and reporting on Environmental Improvement Plans (EIPs). The cycle comprises annual reports by government to Parliament on progress, regular scrutiny by the Office for Environmental Protection, and five-yearly reviews of the EIP. The OEP will scrutinise the government’s annual report, and may recommend how progress could be improved, to which government must respond. The Outcome Indicator Framework provides one method of reporting on the progress of the EIP. The Framework presents an authoritative way to measure changes to our environment. It draws together a comprehensive suite of measures which collectively describe environmental change as it relates to the ten goals of the 25 YEP (which will become the first EIP). The framework was developed using the concept of natural capital. It focuses on the natural capital outcomes and goals that we have set out to achieve, grouped as: (1) Reducing pressures on natural capital assets (e.g. pollution or plant disease); (2) Improving the state of natural capital assets (including air, water, land and seas); and (3) Increasing the benefits that we get from those assets.
Read the full response on Parliament ↗