Select committee: Environmental Audit Committee

Conclusion 37

Fourth Report - Water quality in rivers Published 13 Jan 2022 Paragraph 203
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We have identified multiple potential points of failure in the regulatory arrangements for monitoring, governance and enforcement of water quality. The Southern Water case has given rise to obvious and urgent questions about the system of operator self- monitoring and Environment Agency compliance monitoring. Given the duration of time when misreporting and large spills were routine at Southern Water, we cannot discount the possibility that similar practices have been occurring undetected at other water companies in England.

From: Environmental Audit Committee, Fourth Report - Water quality in rivers (HC 74), paragraph 203, 13 January 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 16 May 2022 (deadline 13 March 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the report and says it agrees there is "more to do", accepting many recommendations, declining some, and deferring others to consultations, reviews and future plans.

  • On sewage monitoring, it "does not accept" the recommendation to install volume monitors at all overflow points, saying volume measurement is "limited by technical feasibility and cost" and "requires further consideration".
  • It "does not agree" that planning authorities should adopt a broad policy against farming infrastructure, and "does not agree" that permitting is "normally an appropriate risk management response" for highway drains.
  • On highways outfalls, National Highways "agrees to set out its plans" by the end of the 2022/23 financial year for how high-risk locations could be mitigated by 2030, but says it is "not possible to make a commitment" on funding at this time.
  • On sentencing for water pollution offences, the independent Sentencing Council "will consider the recommendation in due course", and any changes to guidelines would be "subject to public consultation".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error