Select committee: Energy Security and Net Zero Committee

Recommendation 26

6th Report - Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy Published 5 Dec 2025 Addressed to Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We emphasise that workforce expansion in retrofit and clean heat must go hand-in-hand with high and verifiable standards of competence. Written evidence criticised aspects of the existing skills and competence system in retrofit and related sectors, calling for tighter and more rigorous training standards, improved accreditation and the raising of quality where some courses were described as being of ‘dubious value’. Other submissions advocated expanding mandatory certification and restricting grants to certified contractors as a way to protect consumers and ensure high- quality works. The Government’s workforce strategy should therefore link investment in training to nationally recognised, portable accreditation and competence frameworks, so that consumers, social landlords and public bodies can have confidence that retrofit and clean-energy works are being carried out by properly trained and certified workers. (Recommendation, Paragraph 98)

From: Energy Security and Net Zero Committee, 6th Report - Workforce planning to deliver clean, secure energy (HC 393), 5 December 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 27 February 2026 (deadline 11 February 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it agrees with most of the Committee's recommendations on clean energy and retrofit workforce planning, and says it partially agrees with others, including on skilled immigration conditionality and impact assessments for procurement conditionality.

  • On existing workers, it "agrees" and cites a new North Sea Jobs Service, and says it is "continuing to support" expansion of the Energy Skills Passport, including "exploring" additional sectors such as electricity networks and nuclear.
  • On skilled immigration, it "partially agrees" and states: "We do not currently plan other labour conditionality measures beyond those we set out in the IWP", while keeping policies "under review".
  • On impact assessments for procurement conditionality, it "partially agrees" but says conditionality "would not be within scope of requiring the publication of an impact assessment", and that it will be considered "on a case-by-case basis".
  • On the Regional Skills Pilots, it "partially agrees", says it has "commissioned an independent evaluation", and does not commit to the Committee's summer 2026 reporting date.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error