Select Committee · Health and Social Care Committee

Adult Social Care Reform: The Cost of Inaction

Status: Open Opened: 31 Oct 2024 15 recommendations 12 conclusions 1 report

Successive governments have presented reform ideas for adult social care, yet few of these have been implemented. This inquiry seeks to understand what this inaction is costing. We will investigate the cost of inaction to individuals, the NHS, local authorities and also to the wider economy and HM Treasury, focussing not only on the financial … Show more

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: the cost of inaction HC 368 5 May 2025 27 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

12 items
2 Recommendation 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Publish annual assessment of unmet care needs for adults, including methodology and supporting data.

The Government should publish an annual assessment of the level of unmet care needs for both older adults and working age disabled adults, publishing its methodology and supporting data to ensure transparency and allow for scrutiny. (Recommendation, Paragraph 21) Read more

Government response AI summary
The government did not commit to publishing an annual assessment of unmet care needs. Instead, it described existing measures like the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF) for measuring outcomes, and ongoing efforts to improve data quality and support local authority commissioning.
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
4 Conclusion 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Previous social care reform attempts have failed, eroding the upper threshold and increasing costs.

There have been multiple failed attempts to advance a version of Dilnot’s reforms, during which time more and more people are faced with unknowable social care costs, and inflation has eroded the value of the upper threshold, meaning fewer people benefit from it. We note the establishment of the Casey … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government's response did not address the recommendation regarding social care costs or the Casey Commission. Instead, it discussed DWP's use of PAYE data and SIC codes for Universal Credit customers, and its lack of SOC codes.
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
5 Recommendation 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Consider measures to address the erosion of the social care upper threshold.

Given how often this was raised as an issue, we recommend that the Casey Commission considers measures to address the erosion of the upper threshold. In the meantime, we recommend the Government does the same. (Recommendation, Paragraph 29) 53 Unpaid carers: the hidden cost of inaction Read more

Government response AI summary
The government's response did not address the recommendation to consider the erosion of the social care upper threshold. Instead, it committed to consulting on the design of the Fair Pay Agreement process this year, with secondary legislation and the establishment of a negotiating body to …
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
7 Recommendation 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Require the Casey Commission to establish a workstream to reduce pressures on unpaid carers.

We recommend that the Casey Commission includes a specific workstream dedicated to reducing the pressures on carers, especially young carers. This workstream should consider how to support unpaid carers better, to ensure they get the respite they need and to look after their own health and wellbeing. It should also … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the recommendation but deflects by detailing £9 billion in Better Care Fund funding for 2025-2026, which focuses on prevention and community care, rather than committing to a specific Casey Commission workstream for carers.
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
9 Recommendation 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Prioritise agreement on adult social care funding structure, including a ring-fence for prevention.

We recommend that securing agreement on the funding structure must be the top priority for the Casey Commission and for any future Government reforms. Without this agreement, reform can only ever be piecemeal and short-term in outlook and, ultimately, will fail. We also recommend that any future funding structure includes … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government agrees reform is essential and supports the independent Casey Commission, but states Baroness Casey has autonomy to determine priorities and shape the commission's work, deflecting the recommendation to prioritize funding structure and ring-fence preventative work.
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
10 Conclusion 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Unstable adult social care market results from inadequate funding and rising provider costs.

The funding structure for adult social care, rising costs and the inability to make long-term investment, is creating an unstable and unsustainable care market. Providers are making losses, creating inequities by charging more to self-funders or even planning to close entirely. The Government has not properly considered either the immediate … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government notes it annually reviews capital limits and social care allowances, but largely defers to the independent Casey Commission, which has a broad remit to examine the long-term transformation of adult social care and make recommendations on the charging system.
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
11 Recommendation 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Require cross-government impact assessments for all workforce policy changes impacting the social care sector.

We recommend that any future policy changes or fiscal decisions relating to the workforce should be accompanied by a cross-government impact assessment that sets out the immediate and ongoing consequences for the social care sector. As part of this, the Government should set out what mitigating actions they would take … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government focuses on actions to support carers, committing to increasing the Carer's Allowance weekly earnings limit from April 2025 and reviewing Carer's Leave and the benefits of introducing paid Carer's Leave, rather than addressing the recommendation for cross-government impact assessments for social care workforce …
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
12 Recommendation 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Instruct the Casey Commission to prioritise identifying interventions for a sustainable care market.

We recommend that the Casey Commission prioritises identifying interventions to create a more sustainable care market. (Recommendation, Paragraph 75)

Government response AI summary
The government states that Baroness Casey has full autonomy to determine the commission’s priorities, thereby deflecting the recommendation for her to prioritize sustainable care market interventions, although it also mentions its commitment to local government reforms and the importance of prevention under existing legislation.
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
13 Conclusion 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Low pay for social care workers does not recognise skills and pushes some into poverty.

Low pay does not adequately recognise the level of skill adult social care workers need to do very difficult physical and emotional work. It is both morally unacceptable, and economically shortsighted, that the current pay regime is pushing some into poverty. Higher wages would achieve better quality care and reduce … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government defers to Baroness Casey's full autonomy to determine the independent commission’s priorities, acknowledging her task to make adult social care more productive and preventative, rather than committing to specific actions regarding low pay for care workers.
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
14 Conclusion 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Funding for adult social care fair pay and career pathway plans remains unclear.

We further welcome plans to establish the Adult Social Care Fair Pay Agreement and improve career pathways. However, the Government needs to set out how these measures will be funded, as providers and local government cannot afford to fund them. (Conclusion, Paragraph 86) Read more

Government response AI summary
The government states that the independent Casey Commission has the autonomy to decide how best to examine models of care and funding flows needed for a sustainable system, thereby deflecting the request to set out funding details for the Adult Social Care Fair Pay Agreement …
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
15 Recommendation 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Instruct DWP to collect occupational data to assess Exchequer costs of low care worker pay.

We recommend that the Department for Work and Pensions explores collecting occupational data for benefit claimants, to better understand the cost to the Exchequer of low pay for care workers and to support the case for better pay. (Recommendation, Paragraph 87) Read more

Government response AI summary
The government defers to the independent Casey Commission's autonomy to recommend steps for supporting the adult social care sector, implying it will not directly act on the recommendation for DWP to collect occupational data on benefit claimants for care workers.
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care
18 Recommendation 2nd Report - Adult Social Care Reform: … Deferred

Publish annual official estimates of delayed discharge costs to the NHS, broken down by reason

We recommend that the Department provides an official estimate of how much delayed discharges are costing the NHS, broken down by the reason for the delay and including costs associated with the beds themselves, staff time and wider activity that cannot happen as a result of a delayed discharge. This … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government agrees that publishing cost estimates would improve transparency but notes methodological challenges. It commits to exploring how best to publish cost data rather than directly providing an official, annually updated estimate broken down by delay reason, effectively deferring the specific action.
Read full response →
Department of Health and Social Care

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions
Date Witnesses
19 Mar 2025 Caroline Abrahams · Age UK, Dr Maria Petrillo · Centre for Care, University of Sheffield, Holly, Jayne Simpson, Keyaan, Tom Gentry · Age UK View ↗
5 Mar 2025 Anu Singh · NHS Black Country Integrated Care Board, Councillor David Fothergill · Local Government Association, Dr Birju Bartoli · Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Hugh Evans · Bristol City Council, Isabel Lawicka · NHS Providers, Melanie Williams · Association of Directors of Adult Social Services View ↗
5 Feb 2025 Anita Charlesworth · Health Foundation, Ms Emily Holzhausen CBE · Carers UK, Oonagh Smyth · Skills for Care View ↗
8 Jan 2025 Kathryn Smith · Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE), Simon Bottery · King's Fund, Sir Andrew Dilnot CBE · Commission on Funding of Care and Support View ↗

Who gave evidence

18 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Anita Charlesworth · Senior Economic Adviser Health Foundation 1
Anu Singh · Chair NHS Black Country Integrated Care Board 1
Caroline Abrahams · Charity Director Age UK 1
Councillor David Fothergill · Chair of the Community Wellbeing Board Local Government Association 1
Dr Birju Bartoli · Chief Executive Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust 1
Dr Maria Petrillo · Research Associate Centre for Care, University of Sheffield 1
Holly 1
Hugh Evans · Executive Director for Adults and Communities Bristol City Council 1
Isabel Lawicka · Director of Policy and Strategy NHS Providers 1
Jayne Simpson 1
Kathryn Smith · Chief Executive Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) 1
Keyaan 1
Melanie Williams · President Association of Directors of Adult Social Services 1
Ms Emily Holzhausen CBE · Director of Policy and Public Affairs Carers UK 1
Oonagh Smyth · Chief Executive Officer Skills for Care 1
Simon Bottery · Senior Fellow (Social Care) King's Fund 1
Sir Andrew Dilnot CBE · Chair Commission on Funding of Care and Support 1
Tom Gentry · Head of Health Influencing Age UK 1